RECOGNIZING PALESTINE

The price that comes with recognition is its terrorist activities constitute war crimes warranting being brought before the International Court of Justice!

By Jonathan Feldstein

If you’re keeping score, to date 138 states have recognized the ‘State of Palestine’, most recently Ireland, Norway, and Spain. This begs the question, what are they recognizing?

They have recognized a state that never existed, with a name never used before 1964, but whose national identity is that Israel “occupied” them in 1948. The first time the term Palestine was used was in the 2nd century, over 100 years after Jesus was crucified, to subjugate and embarrass its indigenous people, the Jewish people, after a Jewish revolt to expel Rome from Judea. It is documented in the term Judea capta which the Romans branded on their coins and architecture to document their conquering of the Land and its people.

Coining Conquest. Judaea Capta coins were a series of commemorative coins originally issued by the Roman Emperor Vespasian to celebrate the capture of Judea and the destruction of the Second Jewish Temple by his son Titus in 70 CE during the First Jewish Revolt.

Today’s Palestinian Arabs are a self-identifying mix of indigenous Arabs, and descendants of Arab immigrants from the Arabian Peninsula, Egypt, and Syria.

Today’s ‘Palestine’ is governed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), a terrorist group which, along with Hamas, are dedicated to eradicating Israel, not coexistence. “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” is their genocidal anthem, calling for the destruction of Israel.

One must ask, if “Palestine” was ever independent and therefore occupied by Israel: who was its first king, president, emir, or prime minister? What is its currency? When is its Independence Day?

Dig This! These Jews setting off to work on a kibbutz in this early morning 1937 photograph were known as Palestinians. (Photo: Avraham Malavsky 1937JNF Archive)

How is it possible that the PLO governs a territory that is not under its control, not because of Israel but because of Hamas expelling the PLO in 2007?

What are the “Palestinians” national past times? Celebrating terror, inciting hatred and violence, funding terrorists and their families with an obscene financial incentive known as “pay to slay.”

Why when its terrorists attack Israelis and Jews around the world, the “State of Palestine” is not brought to the International Court of Justice?

Why the double standard?

If we are going to recognize “Palestine,” we must recognize it for what it is: a divisive tool to pressure Israel, a “state” whose only response to multiple offers for actual independence has been violence and terror and death.

Before the PLO was established May 28, 1964, one would be hard pressed to find any mention of the “Palestinians”, referring to Arabs in the Land. Before 1948, “Palestinian” currency issued by the British, had Arabic, English, and Hebrew. Would a Palestinian Arab state, or any Arab or Islamic state, ever have Hebrew on its official currency?

Before 1948, the Palestine Philharmonic was a Jewish orchestra. As were “Palestinian” athletic teams that competed internationally. All Jewish. The daily “Palestine Post” was a Jewish publication. And when the British referred to Palestinians, they were referring to the Jewish population as there was no Palestinian Arab ethnicity recognized by anyone until then. My father was an actual Palestinian.

After creating the PLO and a people for it to represent, Palestinian Arab nationalism existed with the sole purpose of eliminating Israel and the Jewish people. The also PLO tried to unseat the artificial Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in 1970, the entity that sits on 70% of British Mandate “Palestine” – the made-up state to reward their Hashemite allies who hailed from Arabia. Even the PLO knew that this was a fake state. After being squashed and butchered by the Hashemite army, with more casualties in a month than Hamas claims today in Gaza after eight months, they retreated, were expelled, and set their sights only on Israel.

Death to Jews. Eight months before October 7, Palestinians in Gaza celebrate a terror attack that killed seven Israelis and wounded at three others on January 27, 2023 near a synagogue in Jerusalem’s Neve Yaakov neighborhood. (Mahmud Hams/AFP)

In the Oslo Accords, PLO leader Yasser Arafat publicly recognized Israel’s right to exist and renounced “terrorism and other acts of violence” against Israel. Yet practically, the PLO continued to engage in terrorism, and initiated the infamous “Pay for Slay” program, providing hefty pensions for Palestinian Arab terrorists and their families. This represents millions of dollars in the Palestinian Authority’s annual budget, and is subsidized by foreign contributions to the PA. In October 2018, the PLO suspended its recognition of Israel, and doubled down on the funding of terrorism.

This is the “Palestine” the world should recognize. Yes, there are several million people who identify as “Palestinians” today, a reality that will not change.  There needs to be a resolution where they will hopefully, one day, choose to live in peace with Israel, truly renounce and stop inciting terror even among their children as young as pre-school, and live prosperously. But the solution is not to recognize a “State of Palestine” blind to this reality, as a slap to Israel, or thinking in any way that doing so without the Palestinian Arabs having to negotiate and aspire to peace rather than an endless genocidal war, will bring peace closer. It won’t. It only emboldens the terrorists.

‘Pay for Slay’ Policy. Almost one billion shekels ($278 million) in yearly tax revenue that Israel collects on behalf of the Palestinian Authority (P.A.) goes towards Ramallah’s “pay for slay” policy, under which it disburses monthly salaries to terrorists and their families. Seen here is PA leader Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah (Photo by Hadas Parush/Flash90.)

Alternatively, if the world actually recognizes the “State of Palestine” against which it claims Israel is committing acts of war and genocide, and which 138 states that have recognized “Palestine” as an actual legitimate entity, it’s high time that “Palestine” be held to the same accountability as Israel, or any other state. As such, acts of terror that are inspired by, celebrated in, and funded from the “State of Palestine”, constitute actual war crimes and genocide.  “Palestine’s” leaders should have arrest warrants against them. They should be brought to trial, individually and nationally.

It’s doubtful that anyone in Ireland, Norway, or Spain were intelligent enough to note the irony of their recognition of “Palestine” the week of the anniversary of the creation of the PLO. Since a terrorist revolutionary movement can’t have a cause without a people, the Palestinians were invented along with it.

From the River to the Sea- What Does it Mean?

If only the Marx brothers had the sense to create a people, the Fredonians, along with their fictitious country called Fredonia, they could have been recognized as the indigenous people, from the river to the sea, of their imaginary state, receiving billions from gullible governments and terrorist sympathizers around the world. If only Dorothy and the Wizard had a sense to create a revolutionary movement to liberate the Munchkins, the Munchkinland Liberation Organization, the Wicked Witch of the West and Good Witch of the South would have been jailed on charges of genocide of the little people and rotted away in prison.

A Call to Kill. The rallying cry for terrorist groups and their sympathizers – “From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free” – is a call for Israel’s destruction and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 terror attack on Israeli civilians, murdering over 1,200 people in the single deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust.

The world’s double standards are profound. In calling for a “two state solution” nobody is demanding that “Palestine” be democratic. “Palestine” is an anti-democratic kleptocracy that has not seen even a fake election in nearly two decades, and the last time they had an election, Hamas became the parliamentary majority.  The vast majority of “Palestinians” support the genocidal Islamist Hamas, according to their own polls, the same Hamas that slaughtered PLO leaders in Gaza, and then held all Gazans hostage.

This is the “Palestine” to recognize.



About the writer:

Jonathan Feldstein ­­­­- President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians – is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.





BIDEN’S BLUNDERS

A failure to recognize that Israel’s war must be to defeat not appease Hamas and other Iranian proxies.

By Jonathan Feldstein

It’s almost unimaginable to see recent Biden Administration moves going from bad to worse, so much so that these defer any prospect for any real peace, an end to the war against Hamas (and Iran and its proxies) or the return of our hostages.

Words have meaning but when they are mindlessly repeated followed by inaction, they end up hollow and simply embolden the terrorist. Defiantly repeating “DON’T” to Iran before launching an unprecedented massive arial attack on Israel without consequences, and then telling Israel to “take the win” and not respond forcefully has fundamentally undermined both the US and Israel’s deterrence value. Constantly reassuring his support for Israel as “ironclad” but then showing the world in general, its allies, and specifically the terrorists that it is anything but “ironclad”, only stiffens the resolve of the terrorists and makes them less likely to release hostages or to negotiate in any good faith.

Biden’s Do’s and Don’ts.  “Don’t,” said President Biden when asked what his message was to Iran. Iran nevertheless went ahead in an unprecedented attack launching more than 300 drones and missiles towards Israel, to which thereafter Biden pressured Israel not to respond saying: “take it as a win.”

Last week, President Biden went public with his threat to cut off weapons delivery to Israel, suggesting that Israel was using them illegally or irresponsibly, despite his own administration verifying that wasn’t the case.

The first problem with this is that he went public. Not even his mentor Obama did that when he cut off delivery of the precision Hellfire missile.  Cutting off weapons is bad enough. Announcing to the terrorists that he’s doing so across international media simply empowers them.

Specifically, by doing so, Biden gave Hamas abundant reason to refuse any deal to release the hostages, including Americans, that it is holding in Gaza for over seven months. After this happened and with Hamas being jubilant, I created a meme:

Now, with no hostage deal even possible because of Biden emboldening Hamas after his own Secretery of State said that the deal before Hamas “was very generous,” Israel must complete its invasion of Rafah to find and release the hostages and crush the remains of Hamas’ 4 to 5 battalions.

By cutting off precision munitions, Biden is ensuring that more civilians will die, which was the premise that he used to cut off the weapons. Yes, read that again. Dead Gazans blood will be on Biden’s hands.

Biden’s action also emboldens Hezbollah in Lebanon, making an all-out war there more likely, not less so.

Jordan, Egypt and other “moderate” Arab allies are watching Biden’s blunder unfold with multiple negative consequences.  Primarily, it signals that the US is an undependable ally that if it could turn its back on Israel with whom it perennially proclaims enjoys “shared values and strong friendship”, it can do so on them. This is likely to accelerate more extremism. Biden’s blundering also pushes off any possible Saudi normalization with Israel for the same reason. The Saudis don’t need to extend themselves if they don’t believe the US is going to be a reliable partner!

All this sends multiple dangerous messages to Iran and its terrorist proxies, basically that they can get away with their murderous terrorist objectives without consequence. They will feel they have a free pass to operate against Israel and soft Jewish targets globally without restraint.

Joe’s Jitters. As the US election nears, Bidens “ironclad” assurances seem more and more deficient of the ‘iron’ content.

And with the Administration pressurizing Israel not to pursue the ground operation in Rafah will only result in even more Israeli casualties as it will leave Hamas homicidally intact. If will require more conflicts and a wounded nation questioning why so many of its soldiers have died in vain.

Furthermore, look for Russia and China to swoop in to extend their negative influence in the region, and anywhere else they see US policies exposed as weak.  

A few weeks ago, the US passed a bill providing an additional $17 billion for Israel to have the weapons needed to pursue prosecuting a war it neither began nor wanted. Now the US is trying to tie Israel’s hands from doing so. I was asked about this in an interview, and said that I was thankful as an Israeli as well as proud as an American, for the US making the right decision.  But then on reflection, I commented that had Biden not controversially released $6 billion to Iran in the summer, and then another $10 billion to Iran in the winter ($16 billion), and had President Obama not earlier paid off the Iranians with billions more, perhaps there would have been no or far fewer deaths; no emboldening the Iranians, no funding for their proxies, and there would have been no need for an extra $17 billion in defense aid to Israel, and some $9 billion providing humanitarian relief to the people in Gaza.

Just think, what if the US had engaged in a full-scale embargo on Iran, cutting the Islamic regime off from any possible funds, bringing the already weak Iranian economy to its knees, and empowering Iranians to take back their country from the Ayatollahs. There could have been regime change in Iran without a US weapon being fired, a safer world, and no war now on multiple fronts.

Instead, the US through a blundering foreign policy has been complicit in funding Iranian-backed terrorism in the Middle East.

BLOOD ON U.S. HANDS

It gets worse.  After Biden declaring that he is withholding weapons – ostensibly to avoid civilian deaths in Rafah – there have been reports of the Biden Administration offering Israel a deal:

Providing intelligence on the location of Hamas terror leaders in exchange for Israel not conducting an all-out assault.

It is unthinkable that if the US had such intelligence, it would not provide it not as a carrot on the end of a stick, but to help Israel defeat Hamas which the US has acknowledged is an important goal. Had the US ‘as an important friend and ally’ provided this vital intel days or weeks ago, Israel could have cut off the head of the Hamas snake already, saving lives on both sides. If these reports are true, there’s all the more blood in Gaza on the hands of the US administration.

And as the US tries to link Saudi recognition of Israel with a US-Saudi defense treaty, the Saudis surely are looking at all this and questioning the value of any such agreement with the Biden Administration beyond the paper it’s written on, and wondering where it more prudent to wait until after the US election on November 5.

The war against Hamas and other Iranian proxies must be to defeat and not to appease them and certainly not to leave them standing where they can threaten Israel from Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and elsewhere.  Biden would be well served to understand this, recognizing that the only way to defeat the Hamas wing of his Democratic Party to which he is shamefully pandering to is to truly defeat Hamas. 

From Iran with Hate. Israel absorbed the blows from Iran and did not strike back. Has this undermined Israel’s deterrence?
 

For Biden and the Democratic Party, ‘the issue’ is no less existential.  While despite his damaging blundering, Biden still genuinely refers to himself as a Zionist and supporter of Israel but if he allows the Ilhan Omars, Rashida Tlaibs and other Hamas supporters in his own party to win, he may be the last Democratic president who publicly claims support for Israel.

Biden may have already lost Michigan and other battleground states.  Short of declaring war on Israel, it could be a done deal.  Many pundits believe that his appeasement of the Hamas wing of his own party will not only not work come November 5, but is immoral.

What Biden is doing now is extending the war, preventing the completion of the necessary objectives, and creating more casualties. Is there a conspiracy behind it or just plain stupidity?

What happens in Gaza doesn’t stay in Gaza. If only Biden understood that the negative consequences of his policies are horrifyingly far-reaching.



About the writer:

Jonathan Feldstein ­­­­- President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians – is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.





JUDGING GENOCIDE

The ICJ’s decision on ‘South Africa v Israel’ clarified

By Emeritus Professor Raymond Wacks

John Milton, Samson Agonistes

Three months have elapsed since South Africa, donning the mantle of conscientious accuser, applied to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under the Genocide Convention to secure a ceasefire as a ‘provisional measure of protection’. On 26 January, the Court ordered Israel to observe a number of requirements to prevent acts of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, including the killing of Palestinians, causing serious bodily or mental harm to civilians, and ending the imposition of measures intended to prevent births. Israel was also directed to take immediate steps to permit the provision of humanitarian assistance to residents in Gaza. It was given a month to report on the steps it has taken to comply with this instruction. On 6 March, South Africa filed its third request for provisional measures.

Israel responded with a comprehensive repudiation of South Africa’s allegations which, it claimed, constituted ‘a familiar pattern of misrepresenting the reality; falsely attributing that purported reality to Israeli wrongdoing; and libellously assigning to Israel a malign intent that is simply not there.’ This new application to supplement or modify the provisional measures of 26 January, it averred, ‘hinges on a misrepresentation of reality and a sensationalist and obsessive attempt to accuse Israel of the most egregious crimes regardless of the law or the facts.’

Campus Chaos. The writer’s assertion that at most the ICJ judgment has achieved is to “inflame passions” and amplify “the level of antipathy” is all too evident at protests across US colleges such as here at City University of New York (CUNY) , where New York filmmaker Ami Horowitz was beaten, headbutted and punched by an angry mob of anti-Israel protesters on the uptown campus .
 

This conflict stubbornly admits of no middle ground. It continues to ignite a polarising ideological feud between forces, often malevolent, which hinders rational debate. The ICJ judgment has merely inflamed passions and amplified the level of rancour and antipathy. There seems little room for a detached assessment of the crisis, or a path towards a scrupulous deliberation on the facts. Demonstrations in cities and on university campuses in many countries vilify Israel as a genocidal apartheid state that pursues a colonial policy of persecution against Palestinians whose ‘freedom fighters’ are merely expressing their right of self-determination after 76 years of oppression.

At Columbia University, for example, demonstrators chanted:

We say justice, you say ‘how?’
Burn Tel Aviv to the ground,
Ya Hamas, we love you,
We support your rockets too!

In my earlier piece published here soon after the Court’s decision, I suggested that it would be ingenuous to imagine that an age-old flashpoint would be susceptible to simple solutions, especially following the barbarism and depravity of 7 October -murder, rape, torture, abduction, arson, and pillaging – and amid the apocalyptic scenes of medieval privation and devastation in Gaza. I also contended that the ruling may have been misconstrued. It now appears that this may indeed have been the case.

Menacing Mob. Though he never said a word about Israel nor identified himself as Jewish, filmmaker Horowitz at City University of New York (CUNY) was repeatedly told to “Get the f–k out of here.” His only ‘crime’ for this mob, which included an Iman, was that he had been waving an American flag!

In an interview on the BBC on 26 April, former President of the Court, Justice Joan Donoghue – who delivered the majority judgment – stated that what it actually decided was that ‘the Palestinians had a plausible right to be protected from genocide’ and that ‘South Africa had a right to present that in the court.’

The Court, she explained, ‘did not decide, and this is something where I’m correcting something that’s often said in the media. It did not decide that the claim of genocide was plausible …The shorthand that often appears, which is that there’s a plausible case of genocide, isn’t what the court decided.’

In other words, the countless media reports hailing South Africa’s ‘victory’ against Israel, and the jubilation, especially in that country, may have been somewhat misplaced and premature. Her message might be understood as ‘curb your enthusiasm!’

Nothing I have since read dislodges my earlier misgivings about the manner in which the case was presented and conducted. First, the Court ought to have considered whether the Genocide Convention is, in fact, the appropriate legal basis for the litigation. As both the ad hoc Israeli judge, Aharon Barak, and Justice Julia Sebutinde of Uganda (recently elected Vice-President of the Court) point out in their dissenting judgments, the framework of international humanitarian law (IHL) affords a more congenial legal foundation upon which the application should have been mounted. In the words of Justice Sebutinde:

What distinguishes the crime of genocide from other grave violations of international
human rights law is the existence of the ‘intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such’. Accordingly, the acts complained of by South Africa … can only be capable of falling within the scope of the said Convention if a genocidal intent is present, otherwise such acts simply constitute grave violations of international humanitarian law and not genocide as such.

Goodbye Columbia. If South Africa’s application to the ICJ against Israel hoped to end violence, it has fueled it. Seen here are Hamas supporters at Columbia University, New York calling to “Burn Tel Aviv to the ground” while yelling at Jewish students to “Go back to Europe!”

IHL provides that harm to innocent civilians and civilian infrastructure should not be excessive as compared with the anticipated military advantage. The loss of innocent lives is not unlawful providing it complies with the rules and principles of this law. Similarly, the German judge, Georg Nolte, though he concurred with the majority, did not consider the test of genocide as having been met:

I am not persuaded that South Africa has plausibly shown that the military operation undertaken by Israel, as such, is being pursued with genocidal intent. The evidence provided by South Africa regarding the Israeli military operation differs fundamentally from that contained in the reports by the United Nations fact-finding mission on Myanmar’s so-called ‘clearance operation’ in 2016 and 2017 which led the Court to adopt its Order of 23 January 2020 in The Gambia v Myanmar.

It may be that the question of intent was not fully canvassed because, as Justice Donoghue has now made clear, the Court was considering only the extent to which there was a plausible risk that the Palestinians might suffer irreparable harm, or, whether their right to protection against such harm was plausible.

The Court uncritically concurred with the applicant’s assertion that various bellicose statements, uttered in the aftermath of the gruesome 7 October attacks, demonstrate the requisite intention by Israel to commit genocide. But is it unreasonable that, following the homicidal onslaught, which left at least 1,200 dead, many wounded, and some 250 taken hostage, certain Israeli political and military leaders would recklessly unleash clamorous calls to arms, promising vengeance and retaliation for the unspeakable suffering visited upon so many innocent citizens and foreigners?

To treat these spontaneous remarks – made in the heat of a national tragedy – as evidence of a state’s intention to commit genocide seems highly tendentious, particularly as they included comments uttered by individuals with no direct role in Israel’s military decision-making on the ground. They were, in any event, directed at the terrorists, not at the Palestinians or Gazans in general.

The decision, it seems to me, myopically minimised the defence pleaded by Israel. It is astonishing that the judges fail to acknowledge the critical fact that Israel is fighting an enemy that is demonstrably committed to the Jewish state’s annihilation. The 2017 revised (more ‘moderate’) Hamas Charter is explicit in its ambition to continue its resistance until Israel is obliterated:

Palestine symbolizes the resistance that shall continue until liberation is accomplished, until the return is fulfilled and until a fully sovereign state is established with Jerusalem as its capital … [Palestine] was seized by a racist, anti-human and colonial Zionist project … 

This pronouncement requires little clarification.

Fourthly, the judges appeared to neglect the stark reality that Israel’s callous adversary conceals its fighters, weapons, and hostages in a vast subterranean city, and operates amongst civilians in schools, mosques, and hospitals. Imposing a ceasefire, as requested by South Africa, would, as many have pointed out, permit Hamas to regroup. Moreover, as Justice Sebutinde crucially recognises in her carefully reasoned dissent:

[The litigation] is complicated by the fact that in the context of an ongoing war with Hamas, which is not a party to these proceedings, it would be unrealistic to put limitations upon one of the belligerent parties but not the other. Israel would justifiably assert its right to defend itself from Hamas, which would most probably aggravate the situation in Gaza … It is difficult to envisage how one of the belligerent parties can be expected to unilaterally ‘prevent the destruction of evidence’ while leaving the other one free to carry on unabated.’

Are the protesting students politically literate ? This is what was unleashed on Israel on October 7, following Hamas’ charter whose introduction reads: “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it”. (Photo: Mahmud Hams / AFP / Getty)

It is, fifthly, troubling that while the court explicitly abjures any finding of facts, it readily cites a plethora of evidence from various agencies of the United Nations whose neutrality is, at the very least, questionable. They include the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Under Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief, the World Health Organization (WHO), the UN Human Rights Council, and the Commissioner-General of (the recently discredited) UNRWA.

Finally, the judges fail to enquire whether South Africa’s application might be tainted by its cordiality towards Hamas. The country’s current government seems eager to be considered the conscience of the world. Its uncritical embrace of Hamas condemns it to ignominy from which it may never recover. A mere ten days after 7 October, South Africa’s foreign minister, Naledi Pandor, held a telephone call with the leader of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, to express the country’s ‘solidarity and support’ for the Palestinian people. This was followed by a delegation of three Hamas officials to Pretoria. She also visited Iran on 22 October 2023.

This affability with the Islamic Republic could, as Justice Sebutinde justly remarked, actually be put to constructive use:

It was brought to the attention of the Court that South Africa, and in particular certain organs of government, have enjoyed and continue to enjoy a cordial relationship with the leadership of Hamas. If that is the case, then one would encourage South Africa as a party to these proceedings and to the Genocide Convention, to use whatever influence they might wield, to try and persuade Hamas to immediately and unconditionally release the remaining hostages, as a good will gesture.

One shrinks from questioning the bona fides of the applicant’s case. But while it vehemently castigates Israel, its legal representatives barely mention the evil of Hamas and other Iranian proxies. Is it possible that the ANC’s longing to burnish its radical pro-Palestinian (and even pro-Iranian) credentials, blinds it to the suffering of the victims of these crimes? I sincerely hope I am wrong, and that its ostensible moral turpitude is imaginary – even if some have detected a whiff of antisemitism in the applicant’s case. Again, I want to be mistaken. It would be a bitter irony; many South African Jews were in the vanguard of the struggle against the injustice of apartheid. They were tortured, imprisoned, and vilified by the apartheid state. In his autobiography, Mandela reflects:

I have found [South African] Jews to be more broad-minded than most whites on issues of race and politics, perhaps because they themselves have historically been victims of prejudice.

He might have added that several had relatives who were victims of a genuine genocide at the hands of the Nazis.

*

It is likely to be years before the Court delivers its judgment on the merits. Defining genocide is not straightforward; it requires a specific intent to annihilate a group of people. The final ruling may provide guidance on its construction, and distinguish the crime of genocide from other violations of international law, including war crimes over which the ICJ has no jurisdiction.

It is by no means certain that the Court’s readiness to accede to South Africa’s application for provisional measures will translate into a finding against Israel whenever the day of judgment dawns. One hopes that by then the war will have concluded, and that some sort of peace will have been secured.



About the writer:

Raymond Wacks, Emeritus Professor of Law and Legal Theory, is the author of seventeen books, editor of ten, and numerous articles. His books have been translated into more than a dozen languages. They include Personal Information: Privacy and the Law; Privacy and Media Freedom; Privacy: A Very Short Introduction; Law: A Very Short Introduction; and Justice: A Beginner’s Guide. Among his most recent publications are Protecting Personal Information: The Right to Privacy Reconsidered; COVID-19 and Public Policy in the Digital Age; and National Security in the New World Order: Government and the Technology of Information (with Andrea Monti). The sixth edition of his Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory appeared in 2021, as did The Rule of Law Under Fire? His latest book, Animal Lives Matter: The Continuing Quest for Justice, was published in February.





THE GENOCIDE NOBODY TALKS ABOUT

Why the silence surrounding Muslim massacres of Christians across Africa and the Middle East?

By Rolene Marks

The world is disproportionately focused on Israel’s war with Hamas while ignoring ongoing atrocities committed against Christian communities around the world.

As the world focuses on the war between Israel and Hamas, a horrific genocide has escaped global attention. The ongoing genocide of Christians on the African continent – and other parts of the globe. Whenever there is a war that involves the Jewish state, the level of scrutiny is disproportionate and comes at the expense of other conflicts around the world.

Christmas Massacre. Families in Maiyanga bury in a mass grave relatives killed in deadly Christmas attacks conducted by armed groups in Nigeria’s central Plateau State, on December 27, 2023. (Photo: Kim Masara /AFPTV / AFP / Getty Images)

The numbers on the African continent are staggering. According to Genocide Watch, as of 29 February 2000, 62,000 Nigerian Christians have been killed – and the numbers continue to steadily increase. Islamic Fulani militia, Boko Haram and other terror groups maraud through villages, committing wholesale slaughter. These are the ideological siblings of Hamas who committed the most horrific atrocities against the Jewish people since the Holocaust, including burning families alive, raping women and girls and kidnapping over 253.

Home Alone. Without any support from students at colleges in the US and Europe, these Nigerian Christians peacefully protest in Nigeria against violence following Fulani Militias, Islamic Groups mass killing of more than 1,000 Nigerian Christians.(Photo from Aid to the Church in Need)

These groups are also the ideological siblings of ISIS who have committed atrocities against Christians in the Middle East with a barbarism not seen since the medieval era or Middle Ages. Nigeria is one of the deadliest places to be a Christian, according to non-governmental Christian relief organization Open Doors. Since 1 January 2024, 600 Christians have been “hacked to death”. Christians are often forced to change their religion to Islam. Islam continues to spread throughout the continent.

Nigeria is not the only country where Christians are routinely massacred. The world is silent in the face of the genocide of Christians on the African continent.

Global Indifference. No, this is not Gaza but the aftermath of a Boko Horam attack in Nigeria where homes and businesses were raised to the ground and at least 20,000 people fled.  The yellow dots in this Amnesty International image represents damaged or destroyed structures.

The Democratic Republic of Congo is a Christian majority country, but this has not prevented Islamic extremists from attacking communities and villages. According to MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute):

“On April 2, 2024, Islamic State Central Africa Province (ISCAP) conducted an attack on the Christian village of Mangodomu in the Beni Territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Two days later, on April 4, ISCAP released a photoset documenting the atrocity.

In the photos, ISCAP fighters are pictured attacking the village, where they razed Christian homes to the ground, pulled crosses down, and captured and killed Christian civilian villagers.

Muslim’s Mass Murders. Senior analyst at Christian persecution watchdog Open Doors Illia Djadi warns that Christians, 95% of the population of the DRC, are being killed in daily attacks by an Islamic insurgent group that also goes by Muslim Defence International.

Christians in the DRC have faced a surge of violent attacks from ISCAP fighters during 2024, fueled in part by the encouragement of Islamic State spokesman, Abu Hudhayfah Al-Ansari, who has incited the group’s affiliates to target and kill Christians across Africa, the West, and elsewhere.”

Islamic militant groups have declared war on Christians, most prominently in the eastern part of the country. Along with ISCAP, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), one of many extremist Islamic groups who are targeting Christians while seeking to establish Islamic law throughout the region, has perpetrated other atrocities. The International Christian Concern (ICC) reported:

 “For decades, the ADF has killed, maimed, abducted, and displaced millions of people in North Kivu despite the presence of peacekeepers and local and regional troops in the troubled region.”

Christians in Sudan account for approximately 5% of the population. Sudanese Christians have suffered decades of attacks, starvation and displacement, suffering under various military regimes. Sudan’s civil wars temporarily ended in 1972, but resumed in 1983. The Sudanese people suffered as famine hit the region. Four million people were displaced and two million people died in the two-decade long conflict before a temporary six-year ceasefire was signed in January 2005.

In 1985, a surge of Christian persecution resulted in the murder of pastors and church leaders, destruction of Christian villages, churches, hospitals, schools and mission bases, and the bombing of Sunday church services.

Few can forget the genocide of Darfur between 2003 – 2005 where an estimated 200,000 people were killed. A recent resurgence of war in Sudan in 2023 has resulted in over 8 million needing immediate humanitarian aid as widespread starvation is rampant and millions have been displaced.

In 2022, Sudan was ranked as the 10th most dangerous country to be a Christian. Starvation and refugees, due to massive displacement and systematic slaughter, has made lives for Christians extremely dangerous.

Islamic fundamentalist groups threaten to kill many who refuse to convert to Islam. 

South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa, welcomed Sudanese rebel leader, General Mohamad Hamdan Dagalo on the 4th of January 2024, in the days leading up to South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.  South Africa has faced widespread international criticism for ignoring the arrest warrant for former Sudanese President, Omar Al Bashir, for his role in allegedly directing a campaign of mass killing, rape, and pillage against civilians in Darfur.

South Africa told the International Criminal Court that it believed it was under no obligation to arrest Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir during a visit several years earlier even though he was subject to an ICC arrest warrant.

The persecution of Christians has spread to Southern Africa as well. The spread of Islamic extremism endangers Christian communities in countries like Mozambique. Christians in Mozambique face threats that significantly endanger their freedom and safety. The rise of Islamic extremism in the north of the country, especially in regions like Cabo Delgado, has had a devastating impact on the lives of Christians. Mozambique was recently ranked the 32nd most dangerous country to be Christian. Neighbouring South Africa is also vulnerable as incitement and extremism grow. To date this is mostly targeted at the Jewish community who are proudly Zionist but it will not stop there. It never does.

Mass Murder in Mozambique. People flee in September 2023, following Christians massacred in the province of Cabo Delgado by terrorists loyal to ISIS. Since 2017, this area in northern Mozambique has been under regular attack from Islamic fundamentalists.

South Africa is vulnerable to Islamists. Growing poverty, coupled with the ANC’s government’s anti-Western, pro-Hamas and Iran stance on the Middle East, places not just the Jewish community at increasing risk – but Christians as well, especially in vulnerable rural areas. In recent weeks, British officials warned of the high possibility of a terror attack by ISIS.

According to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR), the Islamic State:

 “Seeks to subjugate civilians under its control and dominate every aspect of their lives through terror, indoctrination, and the provision of services to those who obey.”

Many Islamic State actions of extreme criminality, terror, recruitment and other activities have been documented in the Middle East – including the systematic raping of Yazidi women and slaughter of Christians.

International Relations and Cooperation Minister, Naledi Pandor revealed in an online parliamentary meeting in May 2023 that South Africa and Mozambique were in discussion about possibly helping Maputo fight the insurgency. A South African private military company Dyck Advisory Group was reportedly involved on the Mozambique government’s side, mostly mounting aerial attacks with light aircraft.

Islamic State published an editorial on its al-Naba online bulletin warning that if South Africa intervened militarily in Cabo Delgado this:

 “may result in prompting the soldiers of the Islamic State to open a fighting front inside its borders! – by the permission of God Almighty.”

Killing Christians. No concern in neighbouring South Africa when attacks by jihadist insurgents in Mozambique’s northern province of Cabo Delgado are forcing priests, nuns and other church workers to flee to cities already overwhelmed by internally displaced people (IDPs). Seen here are Christians congregating at a church in the Mozambican province of Cabo Delgado calling for peace.

ISIS is not the only threat to South Africa. Increasing radicalization and incitement is spreading across Southern Africa – as it has in the northern part of the continent. Some of the rhetoric from members of South Africa’s Parliament is alarming and while it is aimed at Jews or Zionists, history has proven that it does not stop there. South Africa’s ruling ANC align with Iran whose stated goal is not only to annihilate Israel – but also to establish an Islamic caliphate. This would greenlight radicals to engage in unspeakable atrocities. The ANC and other parties openly support Hamas – an Iranian sponsored proxy whose repeated goal is the destruction of the State of Israel. Hamas thugs also routinely persecute Christians in Gaza. Christian communities in South Africa should be aware that Islamists prey on and exploit the most vulnerable, notably the poor and unemployed Christian youth in the country. South Africa certainly has an abundance of such individuals. Christian communities must be aware of the risks and the threats – and prepare accordingly.

Christians are not just persecuted in Africa – but across the Middle East as well. In 2023, Yemen, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, Morocco, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, and other Middle Eastern and Muslim-majority countries all featured on the list of 50 countries where Christians are persecuted. Israel was not on the list – the Christian community has grown in number in the Jewish State.

On 7 April 2024, global leaders gathered in Kigali, Rwanda to commemorate 30 years since the genocide of the Hutus who slaughtered the Tutsi people. Over 850,000 were murdered and many more mutilated and tortured. South Africa’s President, Cyril Ramaphosa, summoning as much rank hypocrisy as he could, addressed the gathering of world leaders and said, “We cannot turn a blind eye to genocide.”

Ramaphosa may want to start with his own neighbourhood instead of focusing on Israel’s war with Hamas. The genocide of Christians is never spoken about.

It is time to end the silence.





NIGHT OF HORROR

From a small village in South Africa to Israel’s Ben Gurion University of the Negev, a foreign student’s perspective of taking cover from Iranian missiles.

By Kenneth Mokgatlhe

On Saturday night, the autocratic and warmonger Iranian government under Ayatollah Khamenei launched more than 300 missiles against Israel. As a South African studying in Israel – at the Ben Gurion University of the Negev – I experienced the attack first-hand and can say it was the most horrifying night of my life. Following security guidelines provided by the Israeli authorities who had been expecting this insane attack by Iran, my fellow students and I, all had to take cover by running to the relatively safety of bomb shelters. We remained there until the early morning of Sunday. In this first-ever direct attack by Iran on Israeli soil, a young girl from the Bedouin community which is not far from us in Israel’s south is reported to have been injured.

Raw video of Iran’s attack on Israel from the Negev

I grew up in a Christian environment in a village in South Africa, and during Christmas last year, I visited the Old City of Jerusalem and Nazareth. The streets were mostly deserted as could be expected due to the Israel-Hamas war. I was struck to see Israel’s victims of the conflict, the mass of people who fled their homes near the Lebanon-Israel border where Hezbollah is continuing to wreak havoc by firing rockets daily into the north of Israel. 

I know that many people who have been influenced to hate Israel do not even know that the Jewish state is as small as our South Africa’s ‘Kruger National Park’ and is smaller than any of the provinces that make up South Africa. By further country comparison, Israel has a small population of only 9 million and hardly any significant mineral resources. Despite this, proud and resilient Israelis have transformed a desert into a place of wonder, sprouting innovative ideas no less than abundant crops.  I should know – I’m living in Beer Sheva, Israel capital of the desert.

Students dashed for Cover. Within the region targeted by Iran, Ben Gurion University of the Negev where the writer from South Africa is currently studying.

Israel is the only Jewish-majority state in the world. It is a democracy in the sense that you can do whatever you want to do as long as it does not go against the fundamental liberties of others. You can choose to be religious or secular, whether to wear a dress or pants. It’s your choice, unlike what is the case among many of Israel’s neighbors.

For those who only ‘experience’ the conflict on television or in newspapers, war is something that is happening elsewhere. For most the people caught up in it, it is not of their choosing. They are tragically dragged into it. The reality of war is that people die, are injured, are displaced, lose livelihoods and multitudes face famine.

Death comes to easy to too many. There is never a winner in war, hence the need for diplomacy and dialogue to establish peace, security, and stability.

Where is the serious conversation? The world is not talking about how Iranian proxies such as the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in the South have been threatening the existence of Israel for so many years. Having been continually dragged into war in the past by its neighbors, Israelis have had to developed super-advanced military technology to defend their country against these threats. To this end has been the development of its air defense systems such as the Iron Dome, David Sling and Arrow 3.

As a people I have discovered who lovingly embrace life, Israelis have to invest a lot of its time and treasure in protecting life.

In ‘Plane’ Sight. Possibly Iran’s main target, Nevatim Air Base in Israel’s southern desert. (Israel Defense Forces)

Coming from a country once respected for its choice for peace over war, I was greatly disappointed to see some of my fellow South Africans on social media, not only supporting but also calling for more attacks by Iran against Israel. My disappointment was amplified because I know that the citizens from both Iran and Israel are essentially peace-loving people who have no desire nor necessity to go to war. Sharing no borders, there is no quarrel between the people of Iran nor the people of Israel. It was also sad on a more personal level because I know a fellow South African from the same village as me in the North West Province who is studying in Iran – me in Israel; she in Iran. Here we are set on pursuing our education in foreign lands and we find ourselves in two countries unexpectedly in war against each other! I had to take cover; will she soon have to do the same?

‘Remains of the Day’. The remains of a rocket booster that critically injured a 7-year-old Bedouin girl, after Iran launched drones and missiles towards Israel, near Arad, Israel, April 14. (Photo: Reuters/Christophe van der Perre)

Last week, the Argentine court ruled that Iran was the mastermind of the gruesome attacks on the Israeli embassy and the Jewish community center back in 1990 and 1994 respectively in Buenos Aires. People tend to have a selective memory where they only choose to remember the Israeli attack on a building adjoining the Iranian consulate in Syria while refusing to acknowledge the longstanding pain and suffering that Iran is and has been inflicting on the Jewish people both in the Diaspora and in its national homeland.

People should resist formulating their views and perspectives by confining their source material to voices spewing hate. We should take charge of what we feed our minds by fostering a reading culture and discovering fresh insights that will help us avoid being the subjects of cheap propaganda by those driven by narrow personal agendas.

Peace and stability in the Middle East are prerequisites to global security and development. This cannot be achieved by alienating or hating Israel. Genuine peace will require us to be objective, impartial, and factual. We need to be solution-driven rather than calling for expansion of violence which places more people in danger; civilians who are generally peace-lovers. It is incumbent upon us all to call for peace in the Middle East, a peace necessitating a political rather than a military outcome, and that requires sober-minded leaders to come together and confront this long-decade impasse. 

Today the Middle East demands mature leadership not the rabble rousers and sable rattlers.



About the writer:

Kenneth Mokgatlhe is a political writer and columnist studying Master’s at Ben Gurion University in Israel.






SOUTH AFRICA’S SELECTIVE MORALITY

Public hangings, stoning and beheadings are carried out by South Africa’s closest friends without a moral murmur.

By Allan Wolman

South Africa maintains a very warm and close relationship with Iran. Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor recently concluded discussions on “mutual bilateral interests” with President Ebrahim Raisi during her visit to Tehran in late October of last year. Pandor also co-chairs the SA-Iran Joint Commission of Cooperation with her counterpart, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian.

It is widely acknowledged that Iran supports and sponsors terrorism around the world including organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah.

Iranian Justice. Two prisoners were hanged in public in Mashhad on rape charges in May 15, 2018.

The South African Constitution of 1996 upholds the nation’s commitment to human rights and dignity, guaranteeing the right to life and protection from cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment. Furthermore, by abolishing the death penalty, South Africa joined a global movement towards more humane and progressive justice systems, serving as a moral example for others to terminate such draconian practices. Both President Ramaphosa and Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor’s commitment to human rights and the abolition of capital punishment suggests that both would ardently support the country’s stance against the death penalty.

Entertainment in Iran? A huge crowd assembles (including a young child), with some taking photos with their cellphones of a public execution in central Tehran on August 2, 2007. According to the BBC, Iran “carries out more executions than any other country, except China.” (UPI Photo/Mohammad Kheirkhah)

While Iran dominated world headlines these past days, here are some facts that South African media does not report on, nor does the ANC seem to be concerned about human rights when it applies to close friends.

Capital punishment is included in the Iranian legal code, where various methods of execution are practiced, including hanging, firing squad, and stoning to death. Most common is by hanging, but also includes, firing squad and, stoning to death.

Iran’s “Family Values”. Iranian politician and former diplomat Javad Larijani defends stoning for adultery, saying it is a good Islamic law protecting “family values”.

The conservative politician, Mohammad-Javad Ardeshir Larijani, a top adviser to the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei interviewed last year, said that stoning for adultery, is a good Islamic law protecting “family values,” adding that “Stoning is a very important restraining law to protect the marriage contract of families.”

The execution procedure by “Stoning”, involves burying the condemned person up to their chest and then hurling stones at them until they are dead. The stones used are not so large as to kill immediately, but large enough to cause significant pain and injury over a prolonged period.

This monstrous method of execution and systemic oppression faced by women in certain cultural contexts, was brought to life in the internationally acclaimed 2008 Iranian film “The Stoning of Soraya M”  which tells the true story in graphic detail of the stoning to death of Soraya Manutchehri in a small village in southwestern Iran in August 1986. Falsely accused of adultery by her husband who sought to marry a younger woman, the accusation stemmed from Soraya’s refusal to grant him a divorce. Despite Soraya’s innocence, she was subjected to a sham trial in a misogynistic society that favoured her husband’s word. This led to her stoning to death.

Like Iran, Saudi Arabia also has capital punishment within its legal system. President Ramaphosa concluded his State Visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on 16 October 2022, cementing continued bilateral cooperation and consolidated their strategic partnership.

Hardly Heavenly. Breaking its monthly record, Saudi Arabia, the “Home of Islam”,  executed 81 prisoners on 12 March 2022, including these nine men. Executions of prisoners have been carried out in Saudi Arabia with no advance warning to their families, relatives have told the BBC.

Saudi Arabia’s primary method of execution is public beheading by sword, which is typically carried out in a public square after Friday prayers. However, other methods of execution include firing squad and occasionally, death by stoning. The mass execution of 81 people on 12 March 2022 hardly made world headlines. Human Rights Watch wrote:

“Saudi Arabia’s mass execution of 81 men this weekend was a brutal show of its autocratic rule, and a justice system that puts the fairness of their trials and sentencing into serious doubt.”

It remains unclear whether any of those executed were underage at the time of their alleged offenses.

South Africa has ties with Afghanistan via its embassy in Pakistan. The Taliban has only this month announced that they will resume the public stoning to death of women.

Several other Middle Eastern countries that South Africa maintains strong diplomatic ties, still have capital punishment as a legal penalty for certain crimes. Amongst those are countries whose method of execution is public beheading and public stoning.

It is indeed noteworthy that both the Palestinian Authority (in the West Bank) and Hamas (in Gaza), whose cause South Africa and in particular Pandor champions, have laws allowing for the death penalty to be imposed for crimes, such as murder, and collaboration with Israel.

Extrajudicial Executions. Hamas militants grab a Palestinian suspected of collaborating with Israel, before being executed in Gaza City August 22, 2014.(photo: Reuters/Stringer)

How does Minister Pandor balance South Africa’s constitutional commitments to the right to life and protection from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment when engaging with Teheran? This is the same minister known for her strong views on human rights, particularly in ‘select’ countries of the Middle East.

Who can forget this this same minister together with her president, grandstanding at the Peace Palace in The Hague hardly bothered with stoning and beheading during “discussions of mutual interest.”

Proud of constitutionally abolishing the death penalty, South Africa’s biggest buddies are the biggest killers of its own people.

And it says nothing!



About the writer:

Allan Wolman in 1967 joined 1200 young South Africans to volunteer to work on agricultural settlements in Israel during the Six Day War. After spending a year in Israel, he returned to South Africa where he met and married Jocelyn Lipschitz and would run  one of the oldest travel agencies in Johannesburg – Rosebank Travel. He would also literally ‘run’ three times in the “Comrades”, one of the most grueling marathons in the world as well as participate in the “Argus” (Cape Town’s famed international annual cycling race) an impressive eight times. Allan and Jocelyn immigrated to Israel five years ago.





A BOLD BUT BAFFLING BIDEN

We must be grateful for the support – but that does not negate our concerns over US policy when our survival is on the line.

By Jonathan Feldstein

I made it a point not to go to sleep knowing what was coming from Iran.  After Shabbat, we received the instructions from Israel’s Homefront Command that for the next two days, all schools would be closed and Israel’s airport and airspace closed.

Jitters in Jerusalem. Anxious hours for the residents in Israel’s capital as Jerusalem’s night sky was lit up with Iran drones and missiles being intercepted on April 14, 2024.

To be honest, I went into Shabbat (sabbath) nervous that something would happen, particularly that we were near the airport which for sure would be a prime target. Prior to Iran launching hundreds of drones and missiles, the mood of the country was already tense. Then, when we realized what was happening, and that a multitude of missiles were heading our way, people became even more anxious. I didn’t fear as much for myself, but the waiting felt like waiting for an execution to take place – our own!!!!!

Counting the Cost. An Israeli police officer and Arab residents inspect the remains of a rocket booster that critically injured a 7-year-old Bedouin girl near Arad in southern Israel after Iran launched drones and missiles towards Israel. (Photo: Reuters/Christophe van der Perre)

I felt like there was a schizophrenia in the White House that was only emboldening the Islamic regime to act as aggressively as it did. There is no doubt in my mind that President Biden does not want an all-out regional war, and genuinely cares about Israel’s safety. While I am grateful to the US for sharing intelligence and leading the way for other nations to join in supporting Israel’s defense by taking down some of the incoming Iranian missiles and drones before they arrived in Israeli air space, I cannot escape the sense that it has also facilitated the plight where Israel finds itself today vis-à-vis Iran. In November, the Administration released $10 billion to Iran, providing much needed funds for it to pay for its domestic and global terrorist infrastructure, weapons, incitement, and race toward a nuclear bomb. Just imagine what would have happened last Sunday if Iran was armed with a nuclear arsenal?

“Death to Israel”. Shouting slogans, demonstrators in Tehran outside the British Embassy wave Iranian and Palestinian flags in support of Iran launching a massive drone and missile attack on Israel.

While the Administration has “threatened” Iran with tough words like “don’t”, and that its support for Israel is “ironclad”, its further actions tell a different story. These actions inter alia have been notably:

– enabling a damaging UN resolution against Israel

– threatening to withhold essential weapons to Israel

– public displays of friction

In addition to Iran and its proxies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen who are looking closely to see how much they can get away with, so is the rest of the Arab world which considers Iran no less of a threat.  They are watching closely to see how reliable the US – as a friend – really is.

Evaluating Biden’s post-Iran attack, there is reason for concern. While the US President did condemn Iran “in the strongest possible terms,” his wording in the official White House statement referred to “an unprecedented air attack against military facilities in Israel.” I guess the president must have been snoozing when I was jolted out of bed and sent to a bomb shelter with an attack on my community and hundreds of other communities from large cities to small towns, most definitely not “military facilities”.

Intercepting Iran’s Missiles. Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system in central Israel launches intercepts to take out missiles fired from Iran.

Amid the missiles exploding, I could imagine chuckles in Tehran for was Biden deliberately or foolishly misrepresenting the facts?

Biden also reportedly told the Israeli Prime Minister that the United States would neither participate in nor support offensive actions against Iran. The message regrettably went public which consequently undermined its “ironclad” support to an ally that had just been brazenly attacked. It also sent the wrong message of weakness to Iran and its terrorist proxies. The net result is that it puts Israel, the Arab world, and the rest of the world at even greater risk.

So, while Iran’s attack was a failure militarily and we are grateful to the US and the others who played an important role, we are disturbed by these same countries and their leaders warning Israel not to respond for fear it might escalate the situation. The Iranian Islamic regime and its Islamic terrorist proxies now smell opportunity. They calculated that they could launch hundreds of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel and get away with it. They may well be right.

In calculating its own response, balanced with the pressure from the US and others, Israel needs to consider whether other nations, if attacked like Israel was, would respond harshly or would they roll over. Israel needs to calculate that even with the successful air defense array it built and now demonstrated, are these defensive weapons sufficient to keep Israel safe?

Again, it’s the ‘Day After’. While President Joe Biden who is seen here in the White House Situation Room with members of the National Security team during the unfolding missile attacks on Israel from Iran, was quick thereafter to caution Israel against retaliating.  (Photo: Adam Schultz/The White House)

Standing strong and defiantly against the Iranian regime and its proxies is the only effective way to achieve peace, to bring moderate Arab states together in an alliance with Israel, and to protect the world.  Also, Iranians need the external support so they can take to the streets and end the 45-year tyrannous Islamic regime.

Failure to stand up to the Islamic terrorists emboldens and empowers them.

The afternoon following the attack, I dropped off something for my son and daughter-in-law and my three-year-old grandson was on the couch “reading” a book. When I sat next to him, he said:

 “Saba (grandpa), last night we had a siren and I cried.”

“Why did you cry,” I asked. 

“Because I was scared.”

So, I told him that:

“Abba (dad), Saba and Savta (grandma) had a siren too,” and then he went back to his book, as if everything is normal. He’s young enough that he may forget this, but if it escalates, perhaps not. Then again, I feel better about dealing with the threat now even with the trauma, rather than kicking the can down the road for his generation.

If we can even wait that long!


About the writer:

Jonathan Feldstein ­­­­- President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians – is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.





A TOUR OF TRAGEDY

An organized group visit to the devastation of Israel’s south has led to
a reversal of a once-held belief in open borders.

By Adrian Wolff

Ever since I served in the mid-1970’s as a young junior IDF officer in Gaza, I have always felt there are both good and bad people in this world but that one must be circumspect in one’s judgment; do not succumb to perceptions based on abstractions but be guided by facts.

I traditionally supported an open border with Gaza as it fostered a healthy environment of improving relations enabling Gazans to secure employment in Israel in order to earn good wages and provide for their families at home in Gaza. I also hoped that those Gazans who found work in Israel’s enterprising agricultural settlements, would gain from the exposure to our county’s innovative agricultural technologies which they could take home and use to improve Gazan agriculture and impact on the Gazan economy. I most certainly did not expect that many of these workers would rather than taking back “ideas” to improve Gaza, would instead take back “intel” to destroy Israel. 

Employment Ends. For these Gazan laborers who crossed over daily into Israel to work before the October 7 attacks, it may well be their last. (Photo: Said Khatib/AFP)

What came in daily to Israel as “innocent” workers from Gaza, returned to Gaza by night as spies. By providing detailed information to Hamas, they paved the way for the October 7 massacre – the worst day for Jews since the Holocaust.

I learnt this first hand when I recently participated in a specially organized tour by the Israel Military History Association to visit the devastated region and met local residents and community leaders – all one way or the other, survivors of the October 7 massacre. I left this experience with a complete reversal of mindset.

They Came, they Worked, they Betrayed. Palestinian workers from Gaza provided the detailed information of Israeli homes so that the killers knew exactly where to go in their murderous spree.(Photo: Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

What was unleashed on unsuspecting Israelis on their Sabbath and festivity of Simcha Torah was not a Gazan people exercising resistance by but an orgy of savagery where Hamas operatives raped and murdered, burnt families alive, beheaded children, displayed the head of an IDF soldier for sale in Gaza and even booby-trapped a female rape victim’s body with a grenade after murdering her.  The local Gazans population danced in the streets for joy on October 7. This was all made possible by allowing and facilitating Gazans to come and work in Israel so that they could take back vital information. We created our own Troyan Horse and are paying dearly for our folly.

Unlikely to Return. Palestinian workers, who were stranded in Israel since the October 7 attacks, cross back into the Gaza Strip at the Kerem Shalom border on November 3, 2023. (Photo: Said Khatib/AFP)

In Sderot, our group of 50 met with the former head of town security, who explained what happened during the first hours of the invasion on the 7th October. Following the information they gleaned from the workers Israel allowed in, the October 7 infiltrators knew the addresses of all the local municipal personnel, not only where they lived but even who had dogs, metal gates and alarm systems. It was evident, the Hamas terrorists “planned to kill family members together.”

We heard how Hamas overran the local police station which was not only understaffed that day but had no offensive automatic weapons to defend themselves. Hamas captured the roofs of the surrounding apartment buildings and shot any person trying to enter the police station. This area became a ‘killing field’ and 35 Israeli officers were killed in the battles for the police station which the IDF eventually took control of but was so devastated that today is a flat sand field.

A Police Station that Once Was. What was left of the Sderot police station following the massacre and subsequent battles on October 7. (Photo: Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP)

We then visited a kibbutz (that shall remain nameless) on the Gaza border where we were met and addressed by the head of its agriculture. All of the 750 residents of the kibbutz had been evacuated and only a handful of staff and himself were left to manage the agriculture.

He spoke highly of the efficiency of the Tel Aviv municipality in accommodating the kibbutz members in two hotels in Tel Aviv, how the children have been absorbed in local schools and social workers were providing vital assistance. 

We learned how the kibbutz had employed 60 Gazan agricultural workers and then how the terrorists had maps of the entire kibbutz, detailing the homes and with instructions to kill everyone.

Following these revelations, we could well understand why when projecting into the future, his position was to no longer employ Gazans but to use foreign workers instead. It was not a moral but an existential position.

We heard about the experiences of a Commander of an Infantry unit known as “Yamam”. A National Counter-Terrorism Unit, “Yamam”, was established in late 1974 after the Ma’alot massacre on Israel’s northern border with Lebanon that involved the hostage-taking of 115 Israelis by Palestinian terrorists, chiefly school children and ended in the murder of 25 hostages and six other civilians. 

On October 7, the Commander was advised of terrorists in a moshav (a cooperative village community) close to Sderot. The unit arrived at the main gate of the village but had no idea of how of many terrorists there were inside and where they were positioned. Also, they had no map of the village, no battle plan and no heavy weapons. Nevertheless, this small unit entered the village on foot finding along the way corpses of the slaughtered local civilians, which the commander correctly calculated would lead him to the terrorists. It took them two hours to kill all eight terrorists. Unfortunately, a 20-year-old female member of this commando unit was killed by the terrorists during this operation.


Visiting a family in another small village near Sderot, we heard how a group of terrorists entered this village armed with a map of the area that included details of who to kill. The breadth of information the terrorists had was staggering. A wife of an army officer told us the group of terrorists who approached her house, carrying such detailed information that included “we had a parrot at our front door.” The plans that were found confirmed that they were to kill the entire family including their three young children.

This brave woman kept her cool and skillfully engaged the terrorists in conversation managing to hold them off until IDF reinforcements arrived a few hours later.

Once subdued, she asked one of the captured terrorists how old he was. He answered fourteen and revealed that his goal in life was “to kill Jews.”

Site of Slaughter. The writer visits the Nova Music Festival Memorial Site at Kibbutz Re’im where hundreds of party goers were slaughtered by Palestinian terrorists from Gaza.

At days end my attitude had changed. What was evident following Hamas killing over 1200 in the first 36 hours, including the 364 at the Nova Music Festival, and the taking of over 250 hostages into Gaza that the plan was to kill every Jew on sight besides those to be taken as hostages.

It would be not only technically wrong to describe these Hamas terrorists as “animals” it would be an injustice towards animals. Animals kill to eat; these EVIL Gazans kill humans because they are Jews.

Soldier’s Welfare. The writer (right) delivering food parcels to reserve soldiers on IDF bases in the south.

From once a believer in a controlled open border with Gaza, I have undergone in my thinking a complete 180 degrees and would advocate to having the borders permanently closed to daily workers with only exceptions to those who have specific purposes – thoroughly investigated – to gain permits to enter Israel.  

If Hamas was smart enough to import weapons into Gaza as well as manufacture them, then they can find a way to import food and develop employment opportunities other than digging underground tunnels. I have lost all sympathy for them.  The IDF claims more food trucks are entering Gaza today than before the 7th October.  Hamas is stealing the food and selling it. Their suffering is a direct consequence of the war they initiated.



About the writer:

An economics graduate of the University of Cape Town (UCT), Adrian Wolff transitioned from a lifetime in the commercial world to becoming a qualified Israeli Tourist Guide and is the author of ‘ISRAEL A CHRONOLGY – from Biblical to Modern Times’ available through Steimatzky, Amazon, Israel Museum, B-G Airport, Yad Vashem and ANU Museum. Rising to the rank of major in the IDF, Wolff is a member of The Israel Military History Society.
While Israel is presently at war, every Friday, he delivers home-made meals donated by Ramat Hasharon families to army units alternating between the north and Gaza areas.






FROM BEIRUT TO TEL AVIV

Taking the Pulse of a Tense Israel

By Jonathan Feldstein

Last week, I went to Beirut, at least according to Google Maps and Waze. I was driving in northern Israel and no matter what app I used, or how I entered data differently, my starting point brought me to the Beirut airport. A short seven-hour drive from where I was going.

I was not alone – residents across Israel reported disruptions with their GPS-based navigation apps like Waze, Moovit and Google Maps, telling users they were in Beirut, most likely due to IDF jamming actions. After all – there is a war going on!

Which Waze to Go? Waze’s algorithm ‘went crazy’ and started sending people the wrong way.

Things are tense in Israel at the moment. Last week was the last Friday of Ramadan (when there’s usually heightened tension, threats, and violence from our Arab neighbors celebrating the Islamic holy month), and especially this week as Iran threatens to retaliate for the targeting of its IRGC terror leader in Damascus. 

Yesterday I was out with my brother and sister-in-law visiting from the US and received dozens of messages from people asking what they can do, how they can pray, and what the situation is. I wasn’t aware of the reports they were seeing that triggered their concern until later. Frankly, I knew most of all that was going on and have accepted it. Their messages of genuine concern made me a little bit more concerned.  For me, living here amid a war, with the threat of a further escalation from day one (we are now six months into the war) has become the norm. It is really far from normal. 

Here’s what’s going on:

The army has canceled the leave for combat soldiers; more reservists are being called up again; public bomb shelters are open (we have one in our home as do many Israelis); the air force is on high alert, and GPS is being jammed as far south as Tel Aviv because Hezbollah has tens or hundreds of thousands of precision GPS guided missiles that can reach anywhere in Israel.  By jamming the GPS, the expectation is that those pointed at particular targets will miss their mark.  But if only ten percent of the volume of rockets and missiles that Hezbollah has, get through – estimated at between 150,000-350,000 total – there will be a great deal of death and destruction on our side alone.

Northern Exposure. Over 100 rockets were fired by Hezbollah at the Golan and Galilee in what appears to be challenge to Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system’s ability to intercept incoming threats.

Everyone I know with whom I have spoken about it believes that not only is a war with Hezbollah imminent (though different people debate when and under what circumstances), there’s nobody among these people who doesn’t believe that it is necessary, even knowing that thousands or more Israelis may be killed. It will be carnage here, and much worse in Lebanon. We cannot continue living like this and allow Hezbollah to continue threatening us with hundreds of thousands of rockets and precision missiles. At present, some 100,000 Israelis from northern border areas evacuated from their homes and communities. They are refugees in their own country!

The sense of an imminent war existed before events this week. Israeli intelligence, especially in Lebanon, Syria and Iran, as demonstrated with the targeting of this Iranian IRGC terror leader, is excellent. I hope when the war with Hezbollah begins, it will begin and end on our terms. It is scary either way. 

It’s easy to project what many of the terrorists’ targets are. I imagine some of their missiles getting through, hitting sensitive military sites, government buildings, airports, power plants, as well as tall apartment buildings. I wonder if any of them might accidentally go astray and hit either the Al Aqsa Mosque or the Dome of the Rock, Islamic sites on the Temple Mount.  It would be ironic if they took out their own holy sites and shrines, and knowing that of course the world would somehow blame Israel.

In addition to impacting families who will be displaced, suffer loss, and whose loved ones will be called up to fight again, many Israelis like us are stocking up on non-perishable food and bottled water, and making accommodations for the possibility that a terrorist attack could leave us without power for days. As inconvenient as it will be, the thought of walking up seven flights in our building that will not have a working elevator is the least of my concerns right now.

Heating Up. An Israeli mobile howitzer gets into position near the border with Lebanon as Israel and Lebanon prepare for a war neither wants, but many fear is inevitable. (AP Photo/Leo Correa)

It’s a good thing I have a good sense of direction, otherwise when my GPS said I was in Beirut, I might still be lost in northern Israel. Yesterday, amid rocket fire from Gaza (still) and Lebanon (dozens a day), one of the big news items here was the GPS jamming creating huge traffic problems.  I would be lying if I said I wasn’t concerned.  Prayers are needed and appreciated. 

The war in Israel is likely to get much worse before it gets better.  While Israel is currently in combat on multiple fronts – Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and the West Bank – it could dramatically escalate if Iran takes a more muscular posture directly – beyond its proxies. Compounding and confounding Israel’s position is that it has extended enemies from far afield fighting it politically and diplomatically, issuing direct threats and demands, blaming Israel rather than Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran for the war and the threat of escalation. 

Whatever will be, Israel will need its friends standing by its side.  Wherever you are, please show support and pray for Israel to remain strong, unified, and victorious.



About the writer:

Jonathan Feldstein ­­­­- President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians – is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.





TWO QUEENS, SAME GENOCIDAL THREAT

From ancient Persia to modern Jordan the narrative shifts from ‘savior queen’ to ‘drama queen’.

By Jonathan Feldstein

Last week, Jews around the world celebrated Purim, the miraculous biblical story of the Jewish people overcoming a genocidal threat by Haman in the Book of Esther in Persia 2500 years ago. Many Christians also celebrated, knowing that if all the Jews had been exterminated then, Jesus would not have been born. They did so in solidarity with Israel and the Jewish people, especially at such a time as this.

Savior of her People. Queen Esther, the beautiful Jewish wife of the Persian king Ahasuerus and her cousin Mordecai, persuaded the king to retract an order for the general annihilation of Jews throughout the empire. The massacre had been plotted by the king’s chief minister, Haman.

Despite the festive celebrations, the Jewish people are facing a modern genocidal threat again today, headquartered in Persia: Iran. As much as we celebrate Queen Esther and her selfless bravery, there’s another Middle Eastern queen who is fanning the flames of genocide against, and threatening the Jewish people today.

Unlike Esther, an orphan who was born in Jerusalem and exiled in Babylon, Queen Rania of Jordan could not be more polar opposite.  She was born in Kuwait, the daughter of Palestinian Arabs.  Unlike Esther, Rania came from a well-off family, got the best education, and became a desirable match for her King, Abdullah II.

Unlike Esther who remained in exile, Rania came home. What’s now called the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is overwhelmingly ethnically Palestinian because Jordan today was made up, and carved out of 80% of what used to be “Palestine”.  Deliberate or not, her marriage to Abdullah II gave him a kind of legitimacy, consolidating ethnic Palestinian Arabs into the monarchy as no previous Hashemite ruler ever had because they are originally from Arabia.

Queen Deceiver. Throughout Queen Rania’s astonishing interview on CNN with Christian Amanpour, Jordan’s queen places the blame entirely on Israel, dismissing the massacre Israel suffered on October 7 as what Palestinians have suffered ever since every day.

Esther became famous for her selfless and potentially life-threatening sacrifice to save her people.  Upon learning of the threat from Haman against all the Jewish people, Esther instructed all the Jewish people to pray and fast for three days, as she did.  Simply, they turned within, and to the Creator.

Far from being selfless, the at-home Queen Rania has made a habit of blaming others for the problems or her people. Most recently, she has twisted reality and misrepresented facts about Israel’s war against Hamas. Rania is fanning flames of hatred, blaming others, and putting the lives of others at risk, rather than taking responsibility. It would be interesting to know if she ever had a heart to heart with her father-in-law, the late King Hussein. It was during the 1967 Six Day War that her father-in-law attacked Israel, and in the process, lost Jerusalem and Biblical Judea and Samaria on the west bank of the Jordan River.

Rania has a history of public hostile anti-Israel comments, broadcasting these in the global media. Her most recent was with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, the queen’s go-to Israel-bashing journalist.

Blood-Soaked Bed. Why did CNN’s Christian Amanpour fail to show this photo of a blood-soaked child’s bed in Kibbutz Kfar Aza in the aftermath of the Hamas assault on Israel on October 7 when Jordan’s Queen Rania says there’s “no evidence” that Hamas murdered babies and children?

In her polished verbal assault, Queen Rania accused Israel of “dehumanization” of Palestinians, and doing so in a way that is “systematic”. And of course, she nonsensically accuses Israel of “apartheid”. Her blood-libel is not only false, but is based on a false premise that Israelis believe (regarding Palestinian Arabs), “if we don’t kill them, they’re going to kill us.”  Rania blames “hardline leaders for keeping their people in this perpetual state of fear of an existential threat that doesn’t exist and making them feel like just killing Palestinians and killing Hamas is going to be the solution to the problem.”

Hello, Queen Rania. Did you not see Hamas’ own live broadcast of the atrocities they committed on October 7? Do you not think that just maybe their terror and using Gazan civilians as human shields has anything to do with it?

Queen Rania boasted about Jordanian aid to Gazans, conducting the interview in a warehouse amid cartons emblazoned with Jordanian flags. Nevertheless, she said that while Jordan is providing as much aid as possible, her pattern of blaming Israel reached a crescendo with Amanpour. Tone deaf to facts and history of Hamas hijacking Gaza and putting all its residents in harm’s way, she chastised that providing “aid under bombardment does not stop the destruction, the death, and the heartbreak. We cannot save people from hunger only then to bomb them to death.”

Implying that Israel does not have a legitimate cause to defeat Hamas (and parenthetically free Gazans from under the boot of Hamas’ evil terrorist infrastructure and culture), Rania said, “There are no victories to be had as long as this war continues.”

Rania tripled-down on blaming Israel for actual problems that Gazans are suffering, including claims of cutting off food, fuel, and water, rather than place any responsibility on Hamas, or Egypt which also shares a border with Gaza, and under which no shortage of weapons and other terrorist infrastructure have been smuggled. A thoughtful observer wonders if Hamas can smuggle weapons from Egypt, why not food for Gaza as well, even if Egypt blocks such aid.

Blaming only Israel, Rania suggested that it was in fact a calculated, “deprivation by design.” Not very Esther-like to always blame others rather than being introspective.

Amanpour actually asked Rania about the atrocities that Hamas committed on October 7. Rania responded:

“As devastating and as traumatic as October 7 was, it doesn’t give Israel license to commit atrocity after atrocity. Israel experienced one October 7, since then, the Palestinians have experienced 156 October 7’s.”

Seeing is Believing. How does Queen Rania get away with saying that an “existential threat” to Israel from Palestinians “doesn’t exist”, when Hamas senior member, Ghazi Hamad, hailed on Lebanese TV the systematic slaughter of civilians in Israel on October 7, vowing to repeat similar assaults many times in the future until Israel is exterminated?

Presumably, Rania’s interview took place 156 days after October 7, a fact she was prepared with for her scripted talking points. Despite her fine education, Rania must have missed a few math classes because had Gazans experienced 156 October 7 massacres, more than 187,000 Gazans would have been killed, a number so ridiculously high not even Hamas would think to make up such figures.  But facts don’t matter to Rania when good rhetoric and lies can be used to blame Israel and the so-called “occupation”.

Rania must have also missed a few history classes as she pontificated, “I think a lot of people need to know more about this conflict to really understand the intricacies of it, to understand that this is one of the greatest historical injustices, to understand what the root cause of this issue is, to understand that this conflict did not begin on October 7, that that it was a result of years of occupation, of settlement expansion, of human rights abuses, of disregard for international law, and this is what led us to this point.”

Interestingly, she neglected to mention the occupation of Gaza (by Egypt) and “the West Bank” (by Jordan) under her husband’s father, and great-grandfather for whom he is named. To her, the original sin is Israel’s “occupation”, neglecting the fact that when Palestinian Arab ethnicity was invented, so was the “armed resistance” that they still practice – Terror. She forgets that Palestinian terrorists also threatened her father-in-law’s reign, a bloody revolt he put down in September 1970, during which as many as 25,000 Palestinian Arabs were killed.

There’s no doubt that Rania’s remarks were well prepared if not scripted.  There’s also no doubt that Rania would never have given such an interview without the advanced knowledge – if not outright approval – of King Abdullah. While he has plausible deniability regarding her remarks, it would be nonsense to think that he and his court were not consulted, and did not consent. Maybe even helped write the script.

The truth is that while Abdullah did not make these remarks directly, the King has also been doubling down on the anti-Israel rhetoric. In a statement just weeks before Rania’s interview, King Abdullah let slip that he also blamed Israel’s “occupation”.  However rather than using the kinder and gentler approach to the term as coined when his father lost Jerusalem and the west bank of the Jordan River in 1967, Abdullah touted the “70 year” occupation, meaning that Israel’s very existence is by definition illegitimate.

As an Arabian Hashemite King ruling over a territory and people in which he and his tribe are not indigenous, in a country that was made up in 1946, aside from employing unprecedently hostile anti-Israel rhetoric, this gives new meaning to the term “the pot calling the kettle black”.

Back to the Queen and the “occupation”. She opined that “Palestinians do not hate Israelis because of who they are, they hate them because of what they’re doing to them.”

Just because she’s a Queen does not mean she is or ought to be immune from being called out on her anti-Israel diatribe, her deliberate twisting of facts and omitting others, her minimizing Hamas’ actual genocidal threat to Israel and the Jewish people, much less the severity of Hamas’s premeditated use of sexual crimes to rape and mutilate women. Perhaps she does this because she considers herself a proud Palestinian, as Esther was a proud Jew.  Or perhaps because she knows that in some way, if she were actually to speak the truth, she’d risk threatening her husband’s monarchy, also a target of Islamists.

Queen Rania ended her comments magnanimously saying:

 “We in this part of the world need to find a way to share these holy lands in peace.”

When it comes to Black September, Queen Rania has a memory Black Out. While Queen Rania gives her take on history during CNN interview blaming Israel for the plight of the Palestinians, she neglects to mention her own father-in-law, King Hussein (left), who with the support of a Pakistan military team, which included Pakistan’s General Muhammad Zia-Ul-Haq, then a Brigadier (right) who helped King Hussein carry out a massacre in 1970 of up to 25,000 Palestinians, in what is now known as Black September .

The problem is that when she delegitimizes Israel and blames only Israel for the actual suffering that’s happening now, and only blames Israel rather than taking or assigning any Arab culpability for their own situation, she continues generations of lies that does anything but enable us to live in peace.



About the writer:

Jonathan Feldstein ­­­­- President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians – is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.