No surprise university’s recent Convocation election has been described as“Kristallnacht 2025”!

By Marika Sboros

(Courtesy of Biznews where first published)

The University of Cape Town (UCT) was once a glittering jewel in South Africa’s – and the African continent’s – academic crown.

No longer.

That’s thanks to UCT’s unedifying recent history of being held to ransom by students and staff pushing political and ideological agendas.

It has become as one writer put it, “a public university applauding the removal of Jews from a space they helped build, under the polite cover of modern political language.”

UCT’s Council is its “supreme governing body responsible for policy, strategic direction and ensuring sound governance and financial sustainability,” As such, it should be a bulwark against institutional capture.

However, one of its Council members, Dianna Yach, has become embroiled in yet more public controversy that is chipping away at that bulwark. Yach faces scrutiny after UCT’s abrupt announcement on October 30, 2025, that it was switching off life support after 56 years for its “most cherished cultural landmark,” the Irma Stern Museum. The spotlight is on Yach’s role as Chair of UCT’s Irma Stern Museum Committee at the time of UCT’s decision to sever its ties with the museum. 

As a Council member, Yach is already mired in damaging allegations, including lying under oath and serious breach of fiduciary duties, in a landmark lawsuit launched by Prof Adam Mendelsohn, head of UCT’s Department of Historical Studies.

Mendelsohn launched the lawsuit after UCT adopted the so-called “Gaza conflict resolutions” in June 2024. A ruling is expected early next year.

POLITICAL, IDEOLOGICAL EXPEDIENCY

UCT’s decision to sever support for the Irma Stern Museum came as a shock to supporters. Stern is widely acknowledged as one of South Africa’s most prolific and powerful artists, one who played a leading role in introducing avant-garde art to the country.

Some saw UCT’s decision as political and ideological expediency. UCT compounded that by shrouding the decision in secrecy, ratifying it on October 18 and only announcing it after being called out publicly.

Preservation concerns have centred over structural deterioration and maintenance challenges of housing Stern’s collection in The Firs, her Cape Town home since 1927. Reports of the collection now in “secure storage” pending uncertain refurbishment plans have fuelled fears of irreparable damage to the irreplaceable integrity of South Africa’s only artist’s house museum. 

Heritage researcher Phillippa Duncan has described UCT’s decision as yet more “cultural bloodletting” and “a systematic lack of respect for history, older buildings and objects that require care.” 

Stern’s whiteness and Jewishness made things “a little more difficult” by “not fitting in with UCT’s political conversations,” Duncan says. She does not believe that race and religion were “primary triggers” for UCT’s decision.

HIVE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

I think that’s charitable. The primary triggers may lie, more likely, in the hive of conflicts of interest buzzing under the many different hats Yach wears.

Among others, Yach chairs UCT’s Human Resources (HR) Committee; is a member of the UCT Remuneration and Governance Committees; serves “by invitation” on UCT Law Faculty’s Law Clinic Advisory Board; and is one of Council’s two Senate-elected donor representatives.

She is also the Chairperson and the executive director of the Mauerberger Foundation Fund (MFF) Board, one of South Africa’s oldest Jewish, philanthropic organisations and a donor to UCT and the Irma Stern Museum for decades. 

That places Yach squarely in the crosshairs of overlapping donor and governance roles, with duties and loyalties to UCT and the MFF potentially pulling in different directions. 

Her maternal grandfather, Morris Mauerberger, an industrialist and a committed Zionist, founded the MFF in the late 1930s. His philanthropy included regular support for Zionist organisations and projects that strengthened Israel’s infrastructure and education. 

Mauerberger’s will expressly allocated half of the MFF funds in perpetuity to Israel, the other half split equally between South African Jewish and non-Jewish communities. 

The MFF’s decades-long support for Israeli projects includes:

– the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

– theTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa (where there is a Mauerberger building) and

– direct involvement in establishing Ben Gurion University of the Negev in 1969. 

RED FLAGS WAVING

Yach took over as MFF executive director in 2013.  Since then, she has appeared intent on taking the MFF down a different path from the straight and narrow one her grandfather forged – if wildly waving red flags are any indication.

One red flag is her support, well-documented in court papers on public record in Mendelsohn’s lawsuit, for the Gaza resolutions.

One resolution rejects the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. The other effectively calls for an academic boycott of Israel’s entire academic establishment.

The boycott includes, by implication, all tertiary institutions in Israel that the MFF supports, as these can be interpreted, particularly by the BDS movement, to form part of the greater Israeli military establishment. 

Suffice to say, blanket academic boycotts on shaky foundations are fundamentally incompatible with the core values of any university worth its academic-freedom salts. 

Yach appears oblivious to conflict emanating from her support for resolutions that diametrically oppose her grandfather’s legacy – and, perhaps more importantly from the perspective of potential conflicts of interest, the MFF’s stated mission of support for Israel.

ISRAEL AND PALESTINE

Another red flag is few public reports since the horrific terror attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, of MFF donations to the Jewish state – apart from vague references to support for “mental health programmes”.

Yet another flag is reference in an affidavit Yach submitted in Mendelsohn’s lawsuit to MFF donations to “Israel and Palestine”. That will resonate well with anti-Israel groups active on UCT campus, among them South African Jews for a Free Palestine (SAJFP) and UCT Alumni for Palestine, with which Yach is closely allied.

This raises questions about Yach’s involvement with these entities and under which of her multiple hats it lies? 

Yach is also actively involved in alumni affairs and wears a further hat as a member of UCT’s Alumni and Development Advisory Board.

Before UCT Convocation’s AGM and Elections on December 4, 2025, Yach nominated UCT law lecturer Caitlin le Roith, the public face of SAJFP and publicly backed by UCT Alumni for Palestine, to run for the Executive Council (Exco) election. Her nomination was seconded by an SAJFP member and was successful.

Convocation ended up top-heavy with a president and four of five Exco members firmly in anti-Israel camps. The elections became a battleground with the hallmarks of a hijacking, purge, even a “pogrom” against Jews. 

The aims, as supporters of newly elected officials swiftly and gleefully declared on social media, were twofold:

– to defeat the Zionist bloc (a mythical creation of their own making)” and

–  ensure that UCT is “never a home for Zionists”.

If any rhetoric proves that Zionist really is the anti-Israel lobby’s code word for Jews, that was it.

INVERTED RED TRIANGLES

SAJFP leaders have distinguished themselves, if that’s quite the right word, as enthusiastic spreaders of that code word and by using inverted red triangles on social-media posts to celebrate deaths of Jewish soldiers in Gaza.

The Nazis used inverted red triangles to distinguish political groups in concentration camps. After October 7, Hamas began using the symbol as a propaganda prop to identify Israeli military targets. The symbol has spread to anti-Israel protests, especially on university campuses and social media.

The Anti-Defamation League cautions that the symbol’s ties with Hamas help to normalise terrorism and extremism under cover of “resistance”. 

Yach raised eyebrows – and hackles – in September 2025 when she donated R1-million of MFF funds to Dr Imtiaz Sooliman, founder-CEO of Gift of the Givers, for medicines for children in Gaza.

Many consider Sooliman to be an incorrigibly vocal, virulent opponent of Israel and all Jews who support it. He speaks publicly under banners claiming, “We are all Hamas”. He routinely punctuates his rhetoric with antisemitic tropes about “Zionists” who rule the world with money.

Sooliman still faces claims (hotly denied) that Gift of the Givers has funnelled funds to Hamas and other terror groups active in the Middle East for decades.

Yach is impervious to criticism of the MFF donating to a man implacably opposed to her grandfather’s stated mission and vision for the family foundation.

Sooliman has been nominated for a UCT honorary doctorate. UCT’s Council was expected to vote to accept his nomination at its regular meeting on December 6.

REVIEW OF PUBLIC POWER

In the meantime, as Mendelsohn’s legal team notes in heads of argument, the lawsuit has generated “noise” around “geopolitics, antisemitism, genocide and accusations of bad faith” that drowns out what it is really all about.

The application’s merits turn simply on a “review of public power,” his lawyers say.

That review covers allegations against Yach of lying under oath and serious breach of fiduciary duties involving her allegedly deliberately withholding crucial information on predicted loss of donor funding if UCT adopted the resolutions.

It also covers UCT’s adoption of the resolutions despite robust communication beforehand from a major funder, the Donald Gordon Foundation, clearly identifying a significant breach of a clause in their donor-funding agreement.

Breach has legal consequences. It culminated in termination of DGF’s funding relationship with UCT.

In her affidavit, Yach appears to believe that the DGF had no evidentiary “dogs” barking loudly enough to alert Council members to the serious possibility of funding withdrawal.

DGF trustees have confirmed that its dogs were present throughout, barking loudly and clearly. 

FUNDING HAEMORRHAGE

And when the predicted donor withdrawal materialised, the bite was devastating. 

UCT instantly haemorrhaged R220-million DGF funding for its Neuroscience Institute and lost the opportunity of a more than R500-million DGF donation for a new private hospital.

The Dell Foundation withdrew R7-million in student support, agreeing only to continue support for current students but not to admit any new ones to its programme. 

Another question the review raises is why Yach and other Council members decided that “expressing indignation at Israel’s conduct (in Gaza) outweighs the futures of hundreds of prospective students at UCT who have lost funding”?

Yet another question is:

Why they decided that rejecting the IHRA definition of antisemitism was more important than R750-million for both the Neuroscience Institute and a brand-new, state-of-the-art hospital, “without even knowing that such donations were at stake”?

They appear not to have thought through all the implications of the resolutions for UCT of donations from any donors with strong Israeli ties in future.

Yach strenuously denies any wrongdoing. I wouldn’t have expected her to do otherwise.

As Mendelsohn’s lawyers contend, she and certain other fellow Council members may be exposed to damages claims from UCT for non-disclosure of pertinent financial information. 

UCT as “an organ of state controlling public funds earmarked for educational purposes” is, therefore, under “obligation to investigate whether it has such a claim, and if advised that it does, to pursue it.”

Yach and fellow Council members can take comfort knowing they have UCT’s full backing – for now. Despite the serious allegations against her, Yach remains in her multiple positions of power and influence.

That raises the question of whether her position as UCT’s HR Committee Chair has insulated her from the consequences of alleged non-disclosure of pertinent information, or at the very least, an inquiry into her behaviour?

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION

Another question is why UCT chose to act only against Mendelsohn.

UCT suspended him for lodging the lawsuit, citing colleagues’ complaints that he was unfit to head UCT’s Department of Historical Studies. An independent investigation exonerated him and found that the complaints stemmed from colleagues’ dislike of his views on the resolutions.

Despite the exoneration, UCT has yet to reinstate Mendelsohn.  One could reasonably expect Yach, as HR Committee Chair, to have nudged UCT to remedy that.  One would be routinely disappointed.

UCT’s Council has fresh faces and voices after last year’s elections that offer hope of new vision, perspective and direction.

The same cannot be said for UCT’s Convocation. It may be ready, willing and well-placed to accede to growing demands effectively to “cleanse” UCT of troublesome, pesky Jews.

A UCT academic notes in response that “Jews have lived this pattern (of blatant Jew hatred) many times before in many countries…, the world recognises it only in hindsight” but “South Africa is watching it unfold in real time” on UCT campus.

It is telling that the academic has authored the response anonymously to protect her own safety. That speaks volumes about UCT as a campus that has become an increasingly dangerous place for Jews, despite official statements to the contrary.

The academic describes the Convocation elections as UCT’s “Kristallnacht 2025”.

Here is an excerpt: “No windows were smashed. No buildings burned. No mobs gathered. Instead, the purge arrives through motions and voting tallies. Through polite language and procedural respectability. Through the illusion of moral clarity.

“The result is the same. Jewish identity is framed as racism. Jewish belonging becomes conditional. Jewish safety is treated as optional.

“Yet here we are. A public university applauding the removal of Jews from a space they helped build, under the polite cover of modern political language.

“If this is what human rights discourse has become, then the words have lost their meaning.”

Unfolding alongside that collapse of moral meaning is a dystopian irony of ironies: Jews are among those contributing to UCT’s attempts to rid its campus of Jews who happen to be Zionists.

That leaves UCT urgently in need of Council members who prioritise education, ethics and human rights over politics and ideology. It requires leaders prepared to put their political ideologies aside and work together to stem the rising tsunami of antisemitism (under the guise of anti-Zionism) currently engulfing the campus.

If not, UCT will never reclaim its once glittering, global reputation as a bastion of higher learning and academic freedom.

*News Flash:

Dianna Yach is facing a call from a prominent South African-born Harvard Medical School neurology professor to stand down or be fired as Chairperson and executive director of the Mauerberger Foundation Fund (MFF) Board.
Prof Jeremy Schmahmann, a University of Cape Town (UCT) medical school graduate, makes the call in a letter emailed to the MFF Board before its special meeting on Friday, December 12, 2025.
He describes Yach’s support for the “Gaza conflict resolutions” as “unfathomable”.  
Her statements and actions effectively “violate the MFF commitment to academic freedom and MFF’s long history of deep support for Israel,” Schahmann writes. “They aim to torpedo academic engagement between Israeli and UCT academics. They erode donor support for UCT.”
He pays tribute to Yach’s grandfather, MFF founder Morris Mauerberger, as a man who “understood the need for philanthropy” to support the foundation’s commitment to “academic freedom and long history of deep support for Israel.”
Yach should resign or be fired to “allow the MFF to return to its proud past focus”, Schahmann writes.

About the writer:

Marika Sboros is a South African freelance investigative journalist with decades of experience writing fulltime for the country’s top media titles on a wide range of topics. She started her career as a hard-news reporter in the newsroom of the now defunct Rand Daily Mail, a campaigning anti-government newspaper during the worst excesses of the apartheid era. She commutes between South Africa and the UK.

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

Another in endless stories on Gaza that BBC presents narrative to besmirch the reputation of Israel.

by Hadar Sela

Courtesy of CAMERA UK (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting & Analysis)

On the afternoon of November 14^th, the BBC News website published a report by Khanyisile Ngcobo in Johannesburg and Wycliffe Muia in Nairobi headlined “South Africa to investigate ‘mystery’ of planeload of Palestinians”.

The report begins by telling readers that: [emphasis added]

“South African President Cyril Ramaphosa says there will be an investigation into the “mysterious” arrival of a chartered plane carrying 153 Palestinians from Gaza into the country.

The group arrived at OR Tambo International Airport but were initially refused entry and were stuck in the plane for more than 10 hours as they “did not have the customary departure stamps in their passports,” local authorities said.”

Readers are later told that:

“Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber said that while Palestinian passport-holders qualified for 90-day visa-exempt access to South Africa, the lack of departure stamps, return tickets or accommodation addresses in some of the travellers’ documentation resulted in the initial refusal to let them into the country.”

Despite their uncritical amplification of those statements, the writers of this report did not bother to inform BBC audiences that – as noted by the Israeli embassy in South Africa and others – Israel does not stamp passports on exit from the country.

The BBC’s report also tells readers that:

“The circumstances of their departure from Gaza and travel to South Africa remain unclear.”

It goes on to quote a South African media outlet:

“Ramaphosa said the group “somehow mysteriously were put on a plane that passed by Nairobi” and flew to South Africa, reports the News24 site.”

As the BBC knows, since June 2024 Israel has been facilitating the evacuation of Palestinians in need of medical care abroad and their caregivers via the Ramon Airport near Eilat. Indeed, the BBC’s report continues:

“Israeli military body Cogat, which controls Gaza’s crossings, said in a statement: “The residents left the Gaza Strip after Cogat received approval from a third country to receive them.” It did not specify the country.”

France 24 later reported that the “third country” was South Africa. The BBC’s report continues:

“According to the Palestinian embassy in South Africa, the group left Israel’s Ramon Airport and flew to the country via the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, “without any prior note or coordination”.

A statement from the embassy said “an unregistered and misleading organization [had] exploited the tragic humanitarian conditions of our people in Gaza, deceived families, collected money from them, and facilitated their travel in an irregular and irresponsible manner”.”

The BBC’s report has nothing more to tell readers about that “misleading organization” – which is called Al Majd Europe – or about the South African company to which the chartered plane belongs.

Quoting an article that appeared in Ha’aretz, the Times of Israel reports:

“According to Haaretz, the group left Gaza early Wednesday morning, via the Strip’s southern Kerem Shalom crossing with Israel, following Israeli vetting.

Members of the group were then taken by bus to Israel’s Ramon Airport, near Eilat, where they boarded a chartered plane to Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, and from there boarded the chartered flight to Johannesburg.

An earlier group departing Gaza made an identical trip some two weeks ago and disembarked in Johannesburg without incident, Haaretz said. Both journeys were organized by an hitherto unknown organization called Al-Majd, which has received many requests from Gazans who want to leave the Strip, the report said. […]

Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), which oversees the flow of people and goods to and from Gaza, also told Haaretz that the Palestinians had received visas from South Africa ahead of time. COGAT was also cited by the newspaper as saying that, as a rule, Israel always makes sure that there is a country that will accept Gazans departing the Strip.”

The BBC’s report goes on to quote a South African charity which was not involved in the evacuation of that group of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip but which has also been promoting the ‘no exit stamps’ narrative.

“South African charity Gift of the Givers has said it will provide the group with accommodation in the country.

Civil societies in South Africa have called for investigations into the conditions the Palestinians had fled in Gaza and the exact route of the aircraft.”

As explained by a South African commentator, the route taken by the chartered aircraft is already known.

“From Ramon Airport, the group was routed through Nairobi as a routine logistical connection. Global Aviation Flight 901 left Johannesburg on 12 November, landed in Nairobi, and returned early on the 13th carrying the Gazan travellers. Kenya did not stamp their passports because they were in transit. Israel did not stamp passports because Israel discontinued passport stamping years ago to protect travellers from discrimination in countries that penalise entry from Israel. Instead, Israel issues electronic entry cards.

These are standard international practices. Flight records confirm the exact timings.”

  The BBC’s report continues:

“Gift of the Givers has since called for Ramaphosa to investigate the home affairs ministry and border authority for the “humiliation they’ve caused” the Palestinians.

The organisation’s founder Dr Imtiaz Sooliman said this treatment included being forced to wait for hours on the tarmac at the airport, being denied food provided by the group and “using every excuse in the book to prevent these passengers from disembarking”.”

Remarkably, the BBC had nothing to tell its audiences either about the organisation it chose to quote or its founder – including his participation in a Cape Town rally marking the anniversary of the October 7th attacks.

“On 5 October 2024, Sooliman shared a platform under a banner proclaiming, “We are all Hamas” with known Islamist extremists. He said, “Every time we protested, the Zionists were too clever. They were arrogant, acting with impunity, put fear into you. They put fear into corporate corporations, into universities, into communities, into governments, into political parties, into associations. They run the world with fear. They control the world with money. And every time you say something, they terrify you and they say it’s antisemitic. But I’ve got a message for them. Find a new narrative, this one is dull, boring, and stupid.””

More recently, on Holocaust Memorial Day 2025, ‘Gift of the Givers’ co-hosted the screening of a problematic Al Jazeera ‘documentary’. In February 2025 the same charity promoted a video falsely claiming that Shiri Bibas was an Israeli soldier and that she and her two small children had been killed in an Israeli airstrike.

In recent days,Imtiaz Sooliman (with the help of Al Jazeera) has been promoting the notion that the flight that arrived in Johannesburg was part of a scheme of “forced migration” and “ethnic cleansing” of Gazans by Israel. A similar narrative is being promoted by the Palestinian Authority, the representative of which in South Africa was quoted in this BBC report.

Notably, it was the ‘mystery’ narrative promoted by a highly questionable charity – the Gift of the Givers, the PA and others that the BBC chose to highlight in this report on the story. 

About the writer:

UK-born Hadar Sela has a special interest in the influence of the media on the British public’s perceptions of the Middle East and the Islamist networks operating in the UK and  has been published in The Jerusalem Post, The Algemeiner, The Commentator, MERIA Journal and at Harry’s Place, among others.

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

‘Surprise’ arrival of planeload of Palestinians from Gaza exposes how ‘Gift of the Givers’ is de facto running South Africa’s foreign ministry.

By Kenneth Kgwadi

It has become increasingly clear, particularly in the handling of the recent flight carrying the so-called “153 Palestinian refugees”, that Gift of the Givers has effectively assumed control over the functions of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO).

It was deeply embarrassing for the government to remain completely uninformed about the details of the flight, while Gift of the Givers appeared to possess full knowledge of every aspect of the journey – information with significant foreign-policy implications for South Africa. This is especially troubling at a time when the country is already at odds with the United States and its allies.

It is increasingly reasonable to conclude that Gift of the Givers has effectively infiltrated and taken control of South Africa’s foreign policy, which has drifted far from its traditional focus on economic prosperity, peace, African unity, regional stability, and multilateral cooperation. Under the tenure of Dr. Naledi Pandor, foreign policy has increasingly centred on confronting the United States and its allies – particularly Israel – apparently as a strategy to curry favour with China, Iran, and Russia.

Gift of the Givers’ founder Dr. Imtiaz Sooliman, has positioned himself close to influential power centres within DIRCO, to the point where he appears to exert substantial influence over key decisions. He played a notable role in South Africa’s move to take Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – a decision that not only cost the state millions of rands but also provoked serious backlash from the US and its partners.

As South Africa hosts the 2025 G20 summit (22-23 November) without the presence of the world’s largest economy, the United States – and with Mexico and Argentina also absent – the message should be unmistakable. While the summit will proceed, South Africa must urgently reflect on how its international posture is eroding its global standing and take steps to repair its international image.

Many South Africans – including politicians, analysts, and ordinary citizens – have long expressed concern that the government has failed to manage the country’s borders effectively. It has now become even more evident that the state is struggling, and failing dismally, to address the complex and sensitive issue of immigration. Worse still, the authorities appear to be enabling and abetting unlawful immigration, a practice that poses serious security risks to everyone living in South Africa. By allowing people to enter the country without proper screening or due diligence, we are exposing ourselves to avoidable threats.

According to the South African Police Service (SAPS)  crime statistics, 26,232 people were murdered between January and December 2024. What is most troubling is that the majority of perpetrators are never apprehended. This alone demonstrates that South Africa faces a profound internal security crisis – one that demands urgent attention to ensure the safety and security of all residents. Instead of tightening internal security, the government is permitting the entry of additional groups of people without adequate vetting.

Government officials who are making the dangerous decision to admit the so-called ‘Palestinian refugees’ should revisit the historical record of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO). After being expelled from Jordan in the early 1970s, the PLO relocated to Lebanon, entering the country as refugees. Over time, the refugee camps were transformed into heavily armed military bases that overshadowed the Lebanese national army and effectively created a state within a state. Their growing power contributed to the instability that culminated in the Lebanese Civil War of 1975, in which the PLO became a major participant. They were hardly conducting themselves as refugees!

The removal of the PLO in 1982 to Tunisia left the establishment of the Iranian-backed Hezbollah, which continued to cause chaos in that country by attacking Israel from the North. The country that used to pride itself as one of the few hubs of Christians now has below 50% of Christians, with weaker security and instability due to the infiltration of Hezbollah, which has created a state within the state in Lebanon. 

There are numerous economically capable Arab states in both the Middle East and North Africa that should be at the forefront of championing the Palestinian cause. South Africa, by contrast, is grappling with a quadruple burden – poverty, inequality, unemployment, and weak economic growth – which continues to devastate the lives of its citizens. Emerging from the brutality of apartheid, South Africans still carry the deep scars of that system, and their government’s primary obligation should be to prioritise their well-being and socio-economic upliftment.

What, then, elevates the Palestinian struggle above the genocide unfolding in Sudan, where Africans are being killed in large numbers with minimal global outrage?

Why does the ANC government remain conspicuously silent on the humanitarian crises in Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Mozambique, the Central African Republic (CAR), Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Gabon, Cameroon, Burundi, and many other African nations? These countries are battling terrorism, widespread hunger, entrenched unemployment, collapsed governance systems, and various socio-political crises, yet they do not receive the same level of vocal solidarity and diplomatic energy.

South Africa cannot afford to ignore the lessons of history. The security of the nation and its people must come first. During these tumultuous times, South Africa cannot afford to allow its foreign ministry to be hijacked and its national interests diverted by political motivated and agenda-driven non-government organizations like the highly questionable ‘Gift of the Givers’.

About the writer:

Kenneth Kgwadi is a research fellow at the Middle East Africa Research Institute (MEARI).

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

By Lawrence Nowosenetz

Background:

Dr. Naledi Pandor, who as the former South African Minister of International Relations hastily instituted with Iranian complicity the false charge of genocide against Israel at the ICJ, will this November, be visiting the US, where she will publicly engage with audiences. In the photo above, Dr. Pandor is seen  with   senior Hamas politburo member,  Bassem Naim at the Sandton Conference Center on the 10 May 2024. On the 10 November 2025, WELT reported that Naim’s son had been arrested in London on suspicion of receiving weapons from a terrorist detained a few weeks earlier and who had hidden them in Vienna, allegedly preparing for attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets across Europe.  Authorities had positively linked Bassim Naim’s son to a Hamas terror cell that was intercepted and arrested in Germany earlier in October 2025. Bassem Naim’s son will be extradited from Britain to face charges in Germany. Naledi Pandor who has called for “Jihad when necessary” and “armed struggle” is on her way to the United States.

What are her true intentions?  

Will she use her visit in to the US to continue her incitement against Israel, a US ally and show support to Hamas which has been designated as a terrorist organization by several countries, including the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand?

____________________________________

To: The United States Secretary of State

Honorable Marco Rubio, Washington, D.C., USA

Subject: Urgent Concern – Naledi Pandor’s Planned Entry into the United States

Dear Honorable Secretary of State Rubio,

I am writing to raise serious concerns regarding Dr. Naledi Pandor, the former South African Minister of International Relations and current Chair of the Nelson Mandela Foundation. Dr. Pandor is scheduled to appear publicly in Wisconsin on 14 November 2025.

I respectfully request you to consider whether Dr. Pandor’s activities and rhetoric warrant action before her scheduled appearance. Some problematic aspects of her conduct are briefly mentioned.

Dr. Pandor as foreign minister played a key role in the genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2023. In a three-month window preceding South Africa’s 29 December 2023 ICJ filing there was a tightly sequenced diplomatic alignment with actors already promoting the same narrative. Pandor travelled to Tehran for bilateral meetings with Iranian officials. She and President Ramaphosa had diplomatic meetings with Qatar in Doha.   In December 2023 she participated in the “Solidarity with Palestine” conference convened by Mandla Mandela in South Africa. Public records and reports confirm that Palestinian factions affiliated with the PFLP, Hezbollah, Fatah and Hamas were present.

In her visit to the United States in mid-2025, Pandor appeared at events organized by the Chicago-based NGO Justice for All and was promoted and hosted by Nihad Awad, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and a board member of Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN).CAIR has been widely documented by congressional investigations and U.S. court documents as an entity established out of early Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations in North America.

It was at the behest of Dr. Pandor  as chair of the Foundation who invited US sanctioned Francesca   Albanese, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, to deliver the prestigious Nelson Mandela Foundation 23rd Annual Lecture on October 25, 2025, in Sandton, South Africa.

Dr. Pandor has repeatedly stated that “armed struggle may become a necessity” and that Muslims are “permitted to engage in jihad when necessary.” She made these remarks at high-profile events and has previously been photographed in direct conversation with senior Hamas officials. Shortly after the October 7, 2023, attacks in Israel, she also held a call with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, expressing support for what that group called the “Al Aqsa Flood battle.”

Her rhetoric and documented contact with sanctioned figures are not matters of free expression but indicators of alignment with extremist networks. Allowing a former minister who has endorsed violent jihad and engaged with terrorist actors to address audiences in the United States poses clear risks of incitement and public disorder.

As Chair of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, Dr. Pandor continues to use an institution with American-linked donors and partners, including major foundations and corporate sponsors, to advance politically radical messaging. This creates reputational and potential compliance risks for U.S. entities associated with her programs or appearances.

Given the precedent of the U.S. expelling South Africa’s ambassador in 2025 for inflammatory conduct, I respectfully ask that your office bring this matter to the attention of the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security. It is reasonable to request a review of her planned entry into the United States in the interest of public safety and diplomatic integrity.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Nowosenetz
Retired Advocate (High Court of South Africa)
Fulbright Scholar (USA)
Tel Aviv, Israel

About the writer:

Now retired, Pretoria-born human rights and labour lawyer, Lawrence Nowosenetz practiced at the Pretoria and Johannesburg Bar. Recipient of a Fulbright Scholarship, Nowosenetz completed an internship in the USA and served as a part-time Senior Commissioner at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) as well as a panellist at Tokiso Dispute Settlement – the largest private dispute resolution provider in South Africa. He has also served as an Acting Judge of the Hight Court, South Africa. 

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

South Africa aligns its foreign-policy with a partisan UN office to conspire against the Jewish state.

By Grant Gochin

Francesca Albanese’s October 2025 campaign in South Africa was not humanitarian diplomacy. Official records reviewed show that her visit – staged under United Nations insignia while she was under U.S. Treasury sanctions – was conceived, hosted, and protected by South Africa’s own foreign-policy machinery. Naledi Pandor, DIRCO, the Nelson Mandela Foundation, and Palestinian academic Haidar Eid converted a UN mandate into an instrument of lawfare against Israel and the democratic West that sustains it. Their collaboration marks the open fusion of state, ideology, and propaganda.

WHAT AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT DIRCO

For an American audience: DIRCO is South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation – the exact equivalent of the U.S. State Department. It is the executive arm that controls South Africa’s foreign policy, diplomats, embassies, and international legal strategy.

Under the ruling African National Congress (ANC) – the party of Nelson Mandela that ended apartheid in 1994 – DIRCO has been transformed from a neutral diplomatic service into a political weapon purchased, owned and operated by Iran, Qatar, and Hamas.

• It filed the ICJ “genocide” case against Israel in December 2023
•  It hosts Hamas and Hezbollah officials in Pretoria
• It uses South Africa’s UN vote to shield Palestinian terror groups

DIRCO is not a think tank. It is state power – and under Naledi Pandor’s influence, it became the logistical backbone of Albanese’s sanctioned propaganda tour.

PANDOR’S POLITICAL PROTECTION: THE ARCHITECT OF CAPTURE

Files reviewed from October 2025 confirm that Naledi Pandor –  South Africa’s former Minister of International Relations and Cooperation (2019–2024) and now Chair of the Nelson Mandela Foundation – extended direct political cover for Albanese’s travel and appearances.

Pandor is not a bystander. She is the mastermind:

– She personally invited Albanese to deliver the 23rd Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture on October 25 at the Sandton Convention Centre in Johannesburg

– She introduced Albanese as a “woman of conscience and courage” – three months after U.S. sanctions were imposed on July 9, 2025, for Albanese’s illegal attempts to drag American and Israeli citizens before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague

– She moderated the post-lecture conversation, allowing Albanese to accuse 63 democracies – led by the United States—of “collective genocide” in Gaza

DIRCO officials – still loyal to Pandor’s vision – coordinated:

– Albanese’s private briefing with ANC parliamentarians (including ANC Chair Supra Mahumapelo and EFF’s Naledi Mhlongo)

– Her Robben Island photo-op – the prison where Mandela was held for 18 years – to falsely equate Israel with apartheid

– Security, transport, and press logistics for the entire tour

These same records describe DIRCO‘s “soft diplomatic cover,” including interference in foreign legal processes to shield a sanctioned UN official from accountability. Pandor’s dual role – former head of DIRCO and current moral custodian of the Mandela Foundation – made her the gatekeeper. She turned Mandela’s legacy into political currency for a sanctioned propagandist.

MANDELA FOUNDATION’S CAPTURE: FROM MORAL BEACON TO PROPAGANDA  ARM

The Nelson Mandela Foundation (NMF) is not a government agency – it is a registered Public Benefit Organization (PBO) under South Africa’s tax law, meaning it enjoys tax-exempt status like a 501(c)(3) in the U.S. It was founded in 1999 to preserve Mandela’s legacy of reconciliation, truth, and non-racialism.

Under Pandor, it has been fully captured:

– It co-branded Albanese’s 24-page report Gaza Genocide: A Collective Crime with its logo

– It amplified the apartheid analogy across its website, social media, and global newsletters

– It hosted Haidar Eid – a Gaza-based academic who uses Hamas Ministry of Health casualty figures – at a University of Cape Town (UCT) roundtable on October 28

The files show no internal dissent. The NMF functioned as an extension of Pandor’s DIRCO, not an independent civil-society body. This is state capture – a term South Africans know well from the Zuma-era corruption scandals, where government officials hijacked public institutions for private or political gain. Pandor has done the same to Mandela’s name.

DIRCO’S LAWFARE ENGINE: THE ICJ PIPELINE

DIRCO’s internal documentation reveals deliberate integration of Albanese’s messaging into South Africa’s ICJ strategy at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague – the UN’s top court for disputes between countries.

Staff notes and briefing materials show:

-Albanese’s meetings with DIRCO legal advisors were used to refine ICJ pleadings

-Her 24-page report – co-authored with Haidar Eid – was distributed to ICJ delegates as “evidence“

-DIRCO coordinated with Law for Palestine (a Ramallah-based propaganda hub) to frame the report as UN-endorsed scholarship

This is not advocacy. This is operational alignment between a UN office and a national foreign-policy war machine.

HAIDAR EID:FROM ACADEMIC TO STATE COLLABORATOR

Haidar Eid is a Palestinian academic from Gaza, formerly a professor at Al-Aqsa University (a Hamas-controlled institution) and now a research associate at the University of Pretoria – a South African state university.

He is not neutral:

– He is a leading BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) activist

– He is a founding member of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) and the Palestinian BDS National Committee

– He founded the One Democratic State Group

– He was the complainant in South Africa’s ‘Al-Aqsa Docket’ – a legal case targeting Israeli officials

Albanese credits Eid as co-author of her report. DIRCO‘s Director-General Zane Dangor personally received him at OR Tambo Airport in December 2023 as a “guest of the state” shortly before the ICJ filing, stating that DIRCO would “reconnect with the returnees to debrief them and get their perspectives on events in Gaza.”

Eid’s testimony and draft text were integrated into Albanese’s UN-branded document, then fed into South Africa’s ICJ case.

In effect, South Africa imported a partisan activist, gave him state hospitality, and used him to launder Hamas propaganda as UN evidence!

“COALITION FOR GOOD”: AL QARADAWI’S BLUEPRINT REBORN

Albanese, Pandor, and DIRCO intersect again in the Coalition for Good (CFG) – a South African NGO chaired by Dr. Imtiaz Sooliman of Gift of the Givers (South Africa’s largest Muslim charity).

CFG‘s structure and membership mirror Yusuf Al-Qaradawi‘s Union of Good – a global network designated by the U.S. Treasury in 2008 for financing Hamas.

– Pandor is listed as an “esteemed member”

– Albanese was photographed wearing the CFG pin during her October 2025 appearances

– Sooliman publicly stated he invited Albanese to join the Coalition

– CFG‘s fundraising drives were synchronized with Albanese’s report launch and ICJ milestones – promoted as “humanitarian aid” but aligned with lawfare objectives

Sooliman accompanied Albanese to every appearance during her South Africa tour, including on flights between cities.

This is not charity. This is Islamist political infrastructure operating under South African state protection.

FROM MANDELA TO MECHANISM: THE FINAL BETRAYAL

The transformation is complete.

– Pandor’s DIRCO supplies the state machinery

-The captured Mandela Foundation supplies the moral façade

-Albanese supplies the UN branding

-Eid supplies the Hamas-sourced content

Each node reinforces the others. The product is a seamless propaganda loop that uses the language of human rights to launder political warfare – and seeks not coexistence, but Israel’s erasure.

BREAKING THE ALIGNMENT: ACTION REQUIRED

The evidence warrants formal scrutiny, not silence.

The UN must:

-Suspend Albanese’s mandate pending investigation into state coordination and external funding violations

The U.S. Treasury must:

– Impose secondary sanctions on the Nelson Mandela Foundation and DIRCO officials involved in hosting sanctioned individuals of the Coalition for Good and Gift of the Givers for platforming a sanctioned individual

– Revoke U.S. tax-exempt status for any American donor to the Nelson Mandela Foundation, which is now operating as an agent of Hamas

South Africa’s SARS (tax authority) must:

– Revoke the NMF‘s PBO tax-exempt status for political campaigning and sanctions evasion

Global donors must:

In the interests of preserving the true legacy of Mandela, withdraw from any entity bearing his name where Naledi Pandor exercises control.

Pandor and DIRCO have converted diplomacy into propaganda. The Mandela Foundation has converted history into a megaphone and Haidar Eid has converted scholarship into political warfare.

Together, they have turned South Africa into the African staging ground of a global campaign against democracy itself.

Free Mandela’s legacy.

Defund Pandor’s machine. Now.

About the writer:

Grant Arthur Gochin currently serves as the Honorary Consul for the Republic of Togo. He is the Emeritus Special Envoy for Diaspora Affairs for the African Union, which represents the fifty-five African nations, and Emeritus Vice Dean of the Los Angeles Consular Corps, the second largest Consular Corps in the world. Gochin is actively involved in Jewish affairs, focusing on historical justice. He has spent the past twenty five years documenting and restoring signs of Jewish life in Lithuania. He has served as the Chair of the Maceva Project in Lithuania, which mapped / inventoried / documented / restored over fifty abandoned and neglected Jewish cemeteries. Gochin is the author of “Malice, Murder and Manipulation”, published in 2013. His book documents his family history of oppression in Lithuania. He is presently working on a project to expose the current Holocaust revisionism within the Lithuanian government. Professionally, Gochin is a Certified Financial Planner and practices as a Wealth Advisor in California, where he lives with his family. Personal site: https://www.grantgochin.com/

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

Under the banner of the Mandela name, the visit of the UN’s Special Rapporteur to South Africa platformed less of promoting ‘unity, integrity and reconciliation’ and more in spewing hate against the Jewish state.

By Marika Sboros

(First published in BizNews and updated by events)

Francesca Albanese may be an Italian citizen but that hasn’t stopped Italy’s government, led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, from distancing itself publicly from her.

Albanese, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, has been haemorrhaging support in the wake of her recent whistlestop visit to South Africa.

It turned out to be more political rally than the lecture tour as the Nelson Mandela Foundation (NMF) billed it.

Her main aim, in her own words, was to bolster South Africa’s flagging International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel on a genocide charge. It was also to rally support for the global BDS (Boycott, Disinvest, Sanction) movement against Israel.

The NMF invited Albanese, to deliver its prestigious 23rd Annual Lecture on October 25, 2025 in Sandton. It did so at the behest of NMF Chair and former Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor.

Pandor is one of South Africa’s most vocal critics of Israel. She played a pivotal role in launching the country’s landmark genocide case against the Jewish state at the ICJ in December 2023.

Albanese visited Cape Town on October 26 to speak at a rally held in a church. On October 28, she released her latest UN report remotely at the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation headquarters. It is titled: Gaza Genocide: Collective Crime.

On October 29, Italy’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Maurizio Massari, dismissed her report as “entirely devoid of credibility and impartiality.”

He went further during the UN General Assembly’s Third Committee session. Massari criticised her for disregarding the UN Code of Conduct for Special Rapporteurs, which mandates “integrity, impartiality, and good faith.” He called these “the foundation of any credible report… and of the UN itself.”

In South Africa, Albanese’s visit raised concerns in the Jewish community over appropriateness of the NMF inviting a person sanctioned in the US in July for ties to terror groups, including Hamas, to deliver its annual lecture.

Albanese has indulged in Holocaust distortion, trivialisation and Nazi comparisons. She has spread antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories about Jews, money and power.

In a statement, Wendy Kahn, national director of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD), described Albanese as “a figure globally condemned for antisemitic rhetoric and Holocaust inversion.”

She said that the NMF had “betrayed its founding values” in hosting her. Once an institution that symbolised unity, integrity and reconciliation, the NMF had become a “platform for division and hate” under Pandor’s chairpersonship, Kahn said.

Pandor and Albanese “both repeatedly accused of antisemitic bias, now stand together under the banner of the Mandela name, not to bring South Africans together but to unite them in hate.”

Albanese’s lecture was titled Enhancing Peace and Global Cooperation.

As a speaker, she was charismatic, articulate and passionate.

There was little peaceful in her delivery and content. Nor was there the reasoned, calm and fact-finding demeanour one normally associates with officials working on behalf of others at her elevated level.

Her lecture was overblown, rich in moral urgency, light on legal and factual nuance and heavy on emotion – and emotional blackmail.

It was remarkable as much for what she did not say as what she did say.

She chose her words carefully. Albanese described the NMF invitation as a “call to destiny.” She declared that “the world is watching its conscience collapse.”

Throughout, she called Gaza “Falasteen” – the Arabic name for Palestine. It carries significant cultural, political and emotional weight.

She linked Nelson Mandela’s ideals to the fight against “the cruellest injustice of our time” – her words for the “genocide” she claims Israel perpetuated in Gaza.

Albanese did not mention the word, Jew, once.

She repeated the word, genocide, not just once; she intoned it 21 times in her 60-minute lecture. At every mention, with increasingly demagogic intensity, she enunciated each one of genocide’s three syllables.

She called Israel’s war in Gaza a “textbook case of genocide” and South Africa’s ICJ case “a moment of historic resonance”. She framed genocide as a money-making venture for Israel, the US and other countries.

Albanese called genocide “the dormant gene of an apartheid regime rooted in settler-colonialism.”

She omitted any mention of what started Israel’s war against Hamas: the terror group’s genuine genocidal attack on mostly civilian targets in southern Israel on October 7, 2023.

Details of the attack are well-known but bear repeating, since denialism, including by Albanese, is rampant.

On October 7, terrorists murdered more than 1200 people, including children, babies, the elderly, and injured more than 5000, most of them civilians. They mass-raped women and children (the youngest aged just eight), some so violently that their pelvises shattered.

They tortured, burnt alive whole families and shot to death children in front of their parents, parents in front of their children. The terrorists also kidnapped more than 250 people, mostly civilians, and took them back to Gaza as hostages.

Among them were Shiri Bibas, and her sons, 10-month-old Kfir Bibas and Ariel, aged four. All three were murdered in captivity in Gaza.

Captured terrorists revealed orders to rape, kill and kidnap as many Jews as possible. Hamas leaders have since vowed publicly to repeat October 7 “again and again until Israel is annihilated.”

Albanese gave Hamas a free pass. She ignored its charter that is explicitly genocidal against Jews. She ignored its deliberate strategy of maximising civilian deaths in Gaza by embedding among civilians and using civilians as human shields as a propaganda tactic to win sympathy.

Albanese has support for the genocide claim from eminent legal experts and scholars and human rights advocates globally, some of them Jewish.

Globally, equally eminent legal experts and scholars and human rights advocates, Jewish and non-Jewish, vigorously disagree.

They offer legal critiques challenging her framing of genocide.

They stress the Genocide Convention requirement of proof of dolus specialis – the legal term for specific intent “to destroy a protected group in whole or in part.”

The phrase “in whole or in part” is critical. It underscores that intent, not scale alone, defines the crime. It emphasises a critical legal threshold that legal experts say Israel has not met in its military response to October 7, as its army targets Hamas, not Gazan civilians.

Together, these analyses form cross-institutional rebuke of Albanese’s genocide rhetoric.

Apartheid and deliberate starvation of Gazan civilians were more leitmotifs in Albanese’s rhetoric in South Africa.

On October 21, while visiting Johannesburg’s Apartheid Museum, she tweeted: “It reminds me that Apartheid Israel could morph into genocidal machinery (because) no one stopped it.”

Tim Flack, a Cape Town-based PR strategist and military specialist, responded that Albanese was visiting “not to learn but to hijack history.”

Calling Israel an apartheid state “is an insult to those who lived under real apartheid,” Flack said.

Nelson Mandela’s granddaughters, Zamaswazi and Zaziwe Dlamini-Manaway, would agree. After their recent visit to Israel and Gaza, they said:

“Apartheid was government-mandated racial separation. What we saw in Israel and Gaza is very different. There is no comparison.”

Legal scholars have criticised Albanese’s invoking of genocide, apartheid and starvation claims. They argue that collapsing these into a single narrative politicises international law and weakens its deterrent power.

Still, Albanese has fans globally, including in South Africa.

Reverend René August, of SA Christians for a Free Palestine, called her presence “a moral reckoning.” NMF CEO Dr Mbongiseni Buthelezi, said she “embodies” its mission.

The NMF invited groups to have private, round-table meetings with Albanese. Among these were the Jewish Democratic Initiative (JDI) and South African Jews for a Free Palestine (SAJFP). Both groups support the genocide claim.

Predictably perhaps, neither the SAJBD nor the South African Zionist Federation received invitations.

Anton Harber, veteran journalist, JDI board member and former University of the Witwatersrand journalism professor, attended the JDI’s round-table meeting with Albanese and found her “gracious, open and highly intelligent.”

He listened to her lecture on YouTube and said that it “contained nothing new.” He expressed “surprise” at her use of “non-legal, non-diplomatic language.”

Albanese “expresses views the Jewish community should engage with, not close their ears to,” Harber said. He dismissed criticisms of the NMF for hosting her and said it was “shameful” that the SAJBD “should shun” the foundation.

The JDI was “proud to associate with the NMF and what it represents,” he said.

“We feel we have to create open debate as it seldom happens within the community. It is imperative to open up and face hard issues in debate about Zionism, Israel and Jewishness.”

Dr Max Price, JDI member and former University of Cape Town Vice Chancellor, attended the round-table and lecture. Via email, he said he had read Albanese’s report on how companies globally were benefitting from the Gaza war and “occupation of the Palestinian territories” and wanted to “engage her views on questions of sanctions.”

She came across as “balanced,” he said and showed “understanding and empathy with the impact the Hamas massacre had had on Israeli society.”

Albanese was “clearly well read about fascism in Europe and the Holocaust, and appreciates its impact on Jews ever since, and the lessons for the world,” Price said. He called her “an important voice globally.” 

Such engagement was often “especially productive with people with whom, on some issues, you disagree,” he said. 

He found her lecture “disappointing and one-sided.” As she is a rapporteur on human rights, Price “expected her to comment also, and in fact, to condemn the war crimes Hamas committed and their historic genocidal goals and statements.”

Albanese had condemned Hamas atrocities in the past, he said. “Not to have done so in the context of this lecture compromises her credibility.” 

Buthelezi, in his opening remarks, thanked sponsors, including Gift of the Givers. Its founder and CEO Dr Imtiaz Sooliman remains mired in claims that his charity has been a conduit for funding to Hamas and other terror groups.

In the same breath, Buthelezi thanked SAJFP and JDI. The latter’s involvement was limited to round-table private meetings.

It is hard, if not naive, to ignore the propaganda value for the NMF of Jewish support, even if only from a vocal minority. And in a country where the vast majority of Jews (around 90%) are staunchly Zionist. 

The reality is that Jewish support for genocide claims against Israel is not always principled dissent or polemical discussion. It can create legal, moral and emotional landmines detonated from within.

US-Jewish atheist, neuroscientist, philosopher Sam Harris is not a Zionist. He has warned that Jewish endorsement lends “false moral authority” to genocide claims that quickly collapse under legal scrutiny.

Harris noticed the same phenomenon I noted on October 7: the genocide charge was being lobbed globally even before Israel had dropped a single bomb in Gaza in response to the massacre.

“That tells you something about the moral confusion we’re dealing with,” he said on a podcast.

Likewise, Canadian anthropologist Adam Louis-Klein has criticised the genocide claim as a “weaponised identity” tactic that is “ideologically driven, not evidence-based,” and fractures Jewish solidarity.

The reality remains that Jewish support for genocide, apartheid and starvation claims risks creating a halo of ideological cover to movements that, at best, want Israel and Jews demonised and terrorised.

At worst, these movements want Israel and Jews wiped clean from the earth’s face.

*Feature photo:  UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese delivers the 23rd annual Nelson Mandela Lecture at the Sandton Convention Centre in Sandton, Johannesburg. (Photo: AFP)

About the writer:

Marika Sboros is a South African freelance investigative journalist with decades of experience writing fulltime for the country’s top media titles on a wide range of topics. She started her career as a hard-news reporter in the newsroom of the now defunct Rand Daily Mail, a campaigning anti-government newspaper during the worst excesses of the apartheid era. She commutes between South Africa and the UK.

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

No, not wardrobe malfunctions but naked bias in Daily Maverick reportage on Israel.

By Lawrence Nowosenetz

In an editorial on 27 August 2025 Daily Maverick (DM) editor Jillian Green pompously and self-righteously proclaims:

“We don’t, and won’t shy away from reporting on Gaza, famine and the pressing power of now.”

Oh really? 

It seems that the editorial and journalistic staff of DM are stung by allegations in social media and by the public of “perceptions of bias” about coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza. No perception. The bias is real and in your face. A previous version of this article was sent by this writer to DM which was neither published nor acknowledged.  

This is what the article said under the title of:

REPORTING ABOUT GAZA

Factual reporting from war zones has always been problematic as the editor acknowledges. Douglas Murray, a veteran and respected war journalist however points out that reporters and correspondents used to issue disclaimers when reporting from war zones under repressive regimes as their reports were subject to regime restrictions. Gaza under the rule of Hamas is no democracy even during peace time with:

• No press freedom
• No rule of law and
• No right of protest.

Reporters and writers who were too independent or were critical of Hamas were suppressed and even violently punished.

The Daily Maverick, like all the Western media, rely on reports from local journalists and foreign Western journalists in Gaza who suffer from the same restrictions. They are not at liberty to present a balanced picture or one which reflects adversely on Hamas. Ask Palestinian journalist Omar Abd Rabou who is reaching out on X for help to leave Gaza. His ‘mistake’ was that he was critical of Hamas. Frightened for his life, on August 27, Rabou published an abject apology:

 “…not to publish anything against the movement or engage in matters related to the war on Gaza.” 

News from Gaza is distributed worldwide by reputable news agencies. Compromised and unverified reporting is uncritically accepted and then processed into solemn official reports of UN agencies and NGOs with the stamp of authenticity. And so, the mill of disinformation, half truths and outright falsehoods grind on.  DM does not advise of expected journalistic caveats such as:

 – no independent corroboration was available or

– the Gaza Ministry of Health data may be unreliable.

Little coverage of professional and reputable sources which are contrary to the genocide narrative appear in DM. This is so despite that COGAT data from the IDF unit tasked with humanitarian aid in Gaza is publicly and easily accessible as well scholarly and professional refutations of starvation, war crimes and mens rea (criminal intent) on the part of Israel.   

GENOCIDE

Nothing illustrates the fragility of DM’s sources more that its reporting of an alleged genocide in Gaza. It offers no informed analysis by Western military experts such as Andrew Fox, John Spencer and Richard Kemp, senior officers with combat experience in asymmetrical and urban warfare in the Middle East. No careful examination and critical analysis of the fatality statistics in Gaza mainly sourced from the Hamas Ministry of Health. There are published research papers questioning the flawed methodology and basic inaccuracies such as the blurring of combatant and civilian fatalities. DM should pause to question the paucity of images of overcrowded morgues or piles of dead bodies as in Holocaust photographs.   Recently, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) adopted a resolution accusing Israel of genocide.  DM should not have shied away from revealing in its reporting that the resolution was passed by ONLY 126 members of the organisations total 500 members – A vote of roughly 20%! This is hardly a resolution of resounding legitimacy further undermined by the dubious membership of this ‘scholarly’ association which has come to light.   DM should consider the three D’s as an editorial guideline about Gaza. Natan Sharansky differentiated genuine criticism of Israel from antisemitism by asking whether the coverage constitutes:

–  Demonization – typecasting Israel as intrinsically evil, lawless and criminal

– Delegitimisation – questioning Israel’s right to exist as sovereign Jewish state

–  Double standards – ignoring or overlooking worse conduct by its enemies or others and inconsistent application of international law. Here it should be noted Hamas is not a signatory to any international humanitarian conventions nor does it consider itself bound by customary international law of war and human rights. Indeed “resistance by the Palestinian people by all means available at their disposal against an illegal occupying power is a legitimate act” according to UN Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, who was recently in South Africa where she called for the “suspension of all ties with Israel.”

FAKE NEWS ABOUT GAZA

Fake news about Israel’s war conduct abounds. Every now and then a glimmer of truth emerges. We remember the al-Ahli Hospital air strike report wrongly blamed on Israel. A favourite and lurid narrative is famine and starvation in Gaza. A Bild photographer captured the staging of a fake image showing Gazans clamouring for food. Daily Maverick seems to have shied from reporting this. It certainly undermines the media narrative of starvation. DM shied away too from wide exposure of the fraudulent images of emaciated children presented as starving children. Evidence revealed showing that photographs widely showed in the international media of emaciated Gazan children as being fraudulent as they suffered from medical conditions unrelated to malnutrition. Days after Zakaria Ayoub al-Mutawaq emerged a poster child for Gaza starvation after a photo of his emaciated state appeared in The New York Times, the paper had to issue an apology when the child’s medical records were found and made public. It revealed that al-Mutawaq was suffering not from a lack of food but from a congenital disorder thus truthfully revealing his malnourished appearance. The original picture shows both the mother and the brother of the child looking well nourished and completely healthy. They were cropped out of the published photo. No thanks to the Daily Maverick for its failure to expose this fake news maliciously designed to demonise Israel.

‘STARVED’ OF THE TRUTH

According to the latest figures from the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza, (subject to serious reservations about accuracy) as of early August 2025 the figure of deaths by starvation is 188, including 94 children.  

Contrast this with South Africa during peace time that according to DM an average of 30 children die daily from starvation. Nearly 11,000 deaths a year according to South African human rights and social justice activist, Mark Heywood.      

UNICEF says chronic undernourishment is responsible for over half the deaths of South African children under five. One in three children in the country is physically stunted from lack of food. Cape Town’s Children’s Institute, an interdisciplinary and child-centred applied research unit, reveals that 4 million South African children are growth stunted, and 10 million go hungry every single day. South Africa’s claim regarding child malnutrition and death through starvation in Gaza is so deeply flawed and morally compromised that one would expect DM to not evade or deviously dodge from pointing this out.

GAZA IS NOT ONE OF THE GRAVEST HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

The war in Palestine, according to the editor, has escalated into one of the gravest human rights issues of our time. This is biased and risible. It has become an article of faith, a rallying point screamed by the protest mobs worldwide so that questioning voices are drowned out. Many would take exception and wish to challenge this benighted and bigoted view in a calm, rational, factual and objective manner. Ms Green cites as a reason for not allowing publication of contrary DM’spublication of disparaging and misleading coverage about Israel is itself a form of warfare going by the name of propaganda. It is an assault on fairness, objectivity, rationality and factual rigour.

Indeed, Ms Green is utterly and culpably wrong in failing to discern that in our lifetime there have been and still are far graver human rights catastrophes, war crimes and genocides.  According to the IPC, Gaza is facing a “confirmed famine” with half a million people facing phase 5 classification (catastrophic).  Indeed? This is factually contested and does not take into account Hamas culpability in exacerbating food scarcity, a topic which deserves careful and balanced coverage.  Starvation and gross well-documented human rights abuses abound in the world.  All on a far greater scale by any metric than Gaza.  Here are some really gross catastrophes:      

SUDAN

The three-year conflict in Sudan has become one of the worst humanitarian crises of the 21st century, leaving millions of women, children and displaced families suffering from violence, food insecurity and the collapse of essential services.  More than 150,000 people have died.  According to the UN, 30 million people are in need of humanitarian aid.  Famine is affecting children in displacement camps. The displaced population, people forced from their homes in Sudan is 11.3 million. Briefing ambassadors in the Security Council, the UN’s top relief official Tom Fletcher said “women and girls are being raped, people being mutilated and killed – with utter impunity.”

After overrunning the Sudanese Armed Forces’ (SAF) in the last major stronghold in Darfur, RSF fighters moved house to house, with “credible reports,” says Fletcher, “of widespread executions” as civilians attempted to escape. In the Saudi Maternity Hospital alone – one of numerous health facilities targeted in the fighting – nearly 500 patients and their companions were reportedly killed. With tens of thousands of terrified, starving civilians fleeing for their lives, “Those able to flee,” says Fletcher, “the vast majority being women, children, and the elderly – face extortion, rape and violence on the perilous journey.”

SYRIA

Upwards of 200 000 civilians had been killed in Syria between March 2011 and March 2025. This number does not include an estimated 26,000 civilians killed in government prisons. The Syrian civil war has produced the largest number of refugees in the world. As of February 2015, the UNHCR designated the conflict as the “world’s worst humanitarian crisis.” It is estimated that 16.5 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance.

YEMEN

Although Yemen is mostly in the news when it fires missiles at Israel in support of Hamas, less covered is its self-inflicted human misery brough on by its  civil war that began in 2015. According to UNHCR:

 “After ten years of war, Yemen remains one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises. An estimated 4.5 million people – 14 percent of the population – are currently displaced, most of whom have been displaced multiple times over a number of years. More than 18.2 million people are in dire need of humanitarian assistance and protection services. The risk of a large-scale famine in the country has never been more acute. Tens of thousands are already living in famine-like conditions and a staggering five million more are acutely food insecure.” Malnutrition rates among women and children in Yemen remain among the highest in the world, with 1.4 million pregnant or breastfeeding women requiring treatment for acute malnutrition. Meanwhile, Yemeni children continue to be killed and injured because of the conflict and are dying at increasingly high rates due to preventable diseases and malnutrition. According to UNICEF, one in two children under the age of five are malnourished in Yemen.

Any honest, unbiased observer of Gaza would plead no contest.    

THE REAL HUMAN RIGHTS ATROCITIES IN GAZA

Gaza is indeed unique and unparalleled as a grave human rights atrocity but in a totally different sense from the DM narrative.  The war is characterised by the corrupt misallocation of aid money into costly preparation for war by the building of extensive underground combat tunnels by Hamas – not for the protection of civilians as shelters against aerial bombardment -but as military attack and weapons centres exclusively for use by Hamas militants. What is more, all these tunnels are positioned under civilian homes including mosques, schools and hospitals, facts mostly ignored in the international media. It renders civilian structures vulnerable as legitimate military targets of attack and bombardment. The failure of Hamas operatives to wear uniforms makes then indistinguishable from civilians and constitutes perfidy, a crime under the international law of war. It places civilians at risk. Unique too is the refusal to permit refugees from war zones to leave Gaza through Egypt, a fellow Muslim Arab country. In no other conflict in recent history has a population been denied this right.

These injustices and violations of humanitarian law however pale into insignificance when viewed in the light of the barbaric attack by Hamas on 7 October 2023 on Israeli civilians including the abduction and capture of Israeli hostages. All filmed and beyond dispute. Not a single day event either but a continuing international crime and an affront to humanity.

Also overlooked is the indiscriminate firing of thousands of rockets at Israeli cities, not only from Gaza but by Hezbollah and the Houthis in Lebanon and Yemen respectively, territories that were not in any armed conflict with Israel.  Par excellence Iran too, where Iranian missiles caused serious damage to Soroka Hospital in Beer Sheba and the Weitzmann Institute in Rehovot. These are major and egregious violations of the laws of armed conflict and humanitarian law begging the question why DM skirts from focussing on the legal and moral accountability of these belligerent armed forces in perpetrating these war crimes?    

The pages of DM are strangely bereft of outrage or empathy for the unprecedented ongoing starvation and torture of hostages in almost three years of captivity. Although Hamas had released a grim photo of emaciated and skeletal former hostage Evyatar David digging his grave in a tunnel, Daily Maverick failed to interview hostage survivors – some with South African backgrounds – when visiting South Africa. It appears like shying away from a compelling injustice and a humanitarian tragedy of South African interest.  It is also a failure of journalism!

Posturing as the conscience of humanity admonishing readers from burying their heads in the sand, DM publishes a piece entitled:

 “Vicious circle of bloody war crimes makes me feel sick to the core; we can’t bury our heads in the sand,” (Daily Maverick 13 October 2023).

This article by Heather Robinson is a master class in obfuscation and dissimulation. The date of publication tells all.  It was first day Israel had begun its war offensive, but DM had already demonised Israel. “Vicious” yes, “circle” no. There were no Israeli civilians in Gaza since the disengagement in 2005.  IsraeI has never and will never commit crimes like mutilating babies and women, raping women in front of their families, decapitating and murdering civilians in cold blood and all with glee and joy. This is what Hamas does…and films! These rulers of Gaza stand alone in its unprecedented, unprovoked, carefully planned genocidal terror. It takes a special type of twisted historical and moral logic to conflate so called “Israeli oppression” and Hamas so-called “resistance”.  This article was unchallenged despite a refutation submitted by the writer which DM ignored.

BIAS CONFIRMATION  

The simple stratagem that DM uses to manipulate news coverage on Gaza and steer the narrative is simply. It mostly declines to publish any material presenting factual refutation or contrary opinions to DM’s editorial policy about Gaza. It has blocked many refutations and contrary opinions submitted by credible, legitimate leaders and writers in the Jewish community and beyond. Instead, DM is replete with unchallenged demonization of Israel and unbalanced coverage of Palestinian suffering. There is a legal maxim:

‘No one can take advantage of their own wrong’

Hamas is culpable of not taking any steps to prevent civilians from harm. Indeed, it has prevented the evacuation of civilians from war zones and actively promoted suffering. Any unbiased observer would agree, yet Israel unfairly bears the burden of moral opprobrium.   

The veteran British Jewish journalist, Melanie Phillips has exposed this same journalistic self-righteous bigotry in The Guardian. For her service in the quest for truth, she was “othered” i.e. ostracised when she started questioning the hypocrisy of her colleagues about condemning Israel and overlooking the evils of terrorism in the Palestinian conflict.  DM similarly pursues a genocide narrative, reckless whether the facts fit. Eventually the narrative becomes the facts. If this is allowed to happen, we are heading for real danger. Hello Pravda, George Orwell and the world of doublespeak.  

Why doesn’t the DM’s morally blighted editor Green simply abandon the pretence of objectivity and admit that its editorial stance is based on the narrative that Israel is guilty of genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, oppression and colonial domination?

This way it could spare its readers the insult of pretending to pursue truth and promote open reasoned diverse opinion.

About the writer:

Now retired, Pretoria-born human rights and labour lawyer, Lawrence Nowosenetz practiced at the Pretoria and Johannesburg Bar. Recipient of a Fulbright Scholarship, Nowosenetz completed an internship in the USA and served as a part-time Senior Commissioner at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) as well as a panellist at Tokiso Dispute Settlement – the largest private dispute resolution provider in South Africa. He has also served as an Acting Judge of the Hight Court, South Africa.  

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

A coalition of anti-Israel groups in South Africa threatens Johannesburg Holocaust Museum to endorse Gaza genocide claims or face protest and disruption.

By Marika Sboros

(Courtesy of BizNews where article first published)

South Africa’s anti-Israel lobby has lost all its marbles – if its latest initiative is anything to go by.

It has cobbled together a motley group of 14 extremist, pro-Palestinian lobbyists to send a “declaration of intent” to the Johannesburg Holocaust & Genocide Centre (JHGC).

The JHGC is hosting a conference of the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) from October 20-24. The group is not happy about the conference, and lots more besides, as its declaration makes clear.

The declaration is lengthy, laborious, overwritten and heavily weighted with rhetoric, false assumptions and irony. Its tone is strident. It accuses the JHGC of “silence and complicity at a time when a genocide is unfolding before the eyes of the world.”

No prizes for guessing just who the group believes is committing genocide and where.

The group informs the JHGC that it will protest at the venue. It makes a myriad of demands, including that the JHGC names and opposes the “genocide” in Gaza and acknowledges Israeli “apartheid and settler colonialism.”

It also demands that the centre calls for:

–  the closure of the Israeli Embassy

– endorses global BDS (Boycott, Disinvestment, Sanctions) efforts; and

–   partners with “anti-racist, anti-fascist and faith-based groups in education and prevention work.”

If the JHGC agreed to all those demands, it would have no time for the important work it was set up to do.

Its stated mission is to explore 20^th century history of genocide, focus on Holocaust case studies and the 1994 Rwanda genocide, and examine connections between genocide and contemporary human rights issues in South Africa. Its work is also to aid understanding of the consequences of prejudice, discrimination and “othering”.

JHGC makes it clear that, as part of its mission, organisations involved in Holocaust and genocide research (even if controversial) may use its venue to hold conferences.

The anti-Israel lobby’s declaration of intent leaves the group of 14 desperately seeking relevance as the US-brokered ceasefire-hostage release ending Israel’s two-year-long war against Hamas holds by the thinnest of threads.

That’s despite Hamas being in clear breach for not yet handing over remains of all dead hostages – and despite new video footage revealing Hamas in all its vengeful, genocidal extremism, executing and torturing its own people in public.

 Pro-Palestinian lobbyists globally remain deafeningly silent and more concerned with what Israeli football teams are doing.

Leading the group of 14 is the usual-suspect, pro-Palestinian power couple: the South African BDS (Boycott, Disinvestment, Sanctions) Coalition and its devoted bedpartner, South African Jews for a Free Palestine (SAJFP). SAJFP has revelled in its status as a key player thanks to the Jewish voices it brings to the table.

These voices are a tiny, vocal minority of South Africa’s Jewish community, and indispensable to the genocide claim against Israel. They make the claim not just news but narrative gold.

After all, nothing says – “we are not antisemitic, just anti-Zionist” – quite like a Jewish stamp of approval.

SAJFP members appear oblivious to the many landmines for Jews who align with the broader pro-Palestinian movement of Iran-backed Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). All are proscribed as terrorist organisations in many countries.

By default, or design, Jews who support it effectively endorse entities committed to their total annihilation.

In trying to protect Palestinian lives, Jews lend legitimacy to groups committed to ending all Jewish lives. They are left in a moral maze, with no easy exits and plenty of rhetorical tripwires.

The group of 14 includes the ironically titled Queers for Palestine.

In Israel, LGBTQ+ people enjoy legal protections, pride parades and social acceptance. In Gaza, homosexuality is criminalised under Hamas rule. Queer Palestinians face arrest, torture and death, often at the hands of their families.

Under the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, homosexuality is technically legal. However, LGBTQ+ people face widespread social stigma, harassment, and threats of violence, often from family or community members.

Queers for Palestine activists voluntarily embrace a cause that would erase the very freedoms they enjoy were it to succeed politically. They may rationalise such stupidity by saying that solidarity with Palestinians does not imply endorsement of Hamas or homophobia.

However, the juxtaposition is jarring, with rainbow flags waving in defence of a region where flying one could mean a death sentence.

The dominant aim of the group of 14’s declaration of intent is clearly to breathe new life into the zombie genocide claim. It falsely claims that “by now, every serious legal and scholarly authority has reached the same conclusion (that Israel is committing genocide).”

If the lobbyists had asked, I could’ve told them that that’s false. I could’ve provided a list of serious legal and scholarly authorities, Jews and non-Jews, who’ve reached the opposite conclusion (that Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza).

The list is too long to name them all here.

Eminent Jewish scholars and commentators argue that the genocide claim is a modern blood libel that echoes medieval myths about Jews murdering Christian babies to drink their blood.

It symbolically recasts Jews, historically victims of genocide, as perpetrators. It equates Israeli military actions with deliberate child-killing.

Critics warn that the genocide blood libel distorts legal definitions, ignores context and fuels antisemitic tropes, portraying Jews as uniquely monstrous.

It ignores the essential legal threshold for genocide – that the necessary special intent to destroy a group in whole or in part should be the “only inference that could reasonably be drawn from the acts in question,” as the International Court of Justice ruled in the Croatia vs Serbia case in 2015. It collapses complex military conflicts into morally absolute narratives.

The group of 14 intends writing to the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) to say that by “hosting their gathering at a venue that refuses to name Gaza as a genocide, they are legitimising both-siderism and moral cowardice.”

I could have told them to say nothing about anything to do with the IAGS, as the organisation is beset by possibly terminal credibility issues.

In September, the IAGS passed a resolution accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. Mainstream media, including Reuters, and the BBC and The Guardian in the UK, instantly framed and amplified the resolution as “expert consensus”.

IAGS head Melanie O’Brien publicly supported the vote, stressing that the resolution passed with “overwhelming support.”

She was disingenuous in the extreme.

The voting was a sham, fractious affair marked by procedural flaws, divided membership and claims of hijacking and “invasion” by anti-Israel forces. It relied heavily on notoriously unreliable “Hamas-produced statistics,” without distinguishing civilians from combatants.

Although 86% of voters passed the resolution, only approximately 111 out of 129 participants, or just 22-28% of the claimed 500-member base, had voted.

The resolution’s passage without prior debate, town halls or disclosure of authors sparked immediate backlash. O’Brien’s stance drew praise and backlash, reflecting deep divisions in genocide interpretations in contemporary conflicts.  

IAGS member Rachel Stein, a US legal scholar in international criminal law, called the vote:

 “…deeply biased and inaccurate”.

Stein said it ignored Israel’s stated intent in prosecuting the war that Hamas started – releasing all remaining hostages, dead or alive, and disarming Hamas.

Critics also raised questions about the IAGS $30 entry fee as the primary membership criterion, for low-income members requiring no verification of expertise. As Grok points out, this allowed non-experts, activists, artists and even prank social media accounts on X, such as “Adolf Hitler” or “Emperor Palpatine”, to become members and vote.

In October 2023, this reportedly led to a membership surge from around 150 to over 500, with nearly half reportedly from Iraq.  Not surprisingly, the IAGS is left looking like a platform for activism rather than rigorous analysis.

The controversy reveals wider global tensions, blurring the line between genuine academic inquiry and activism. It risks the weaponisation of genocide discourse amidst conflict.

At heart, the group of 14’s “declaration of intent” ends up just another a “familiar script”, one that Canadian anthropologist Adam Louis-Klein has identified. It “circulates among anti-Zionist Jews globally,” he says in a social-media post.

Louis-Klein explains the script as a story of a character raised within a supposedly narrow world of Zionist “indoctrination” only to “wake up through an encounter with progressivism.” The character concludes that Zionism is “incompatible with their newfound moral clarity.”

After nearly two years of darkness, the Gaza ceasefire has brought flickers of light, increasing moral clarity and cautious optimism. Images of families embracing loved ones who survived the hell of Hamas captivity pay homage to the power of commitment, endurance and love.

But joy is tempered with profound, dark grief as Hamas prolongs the torment of families still waiting for closure in Israel.

Accusations of genocide against Israel continue. The extent to which Hamas weaponised deliberate starvation – hoarding aid, punishing dissent, turning hunger into control and starving hostages close to the point of death – is clear.

Hamas started this war with its genuinely genocidal rampage in southern Israel on October 7, 2023.

As Gaza exhales and its displaced people return to their homes, the true architects of genocide against Israel and Jews stand increasingly exposed.

The world community needs a real “awakening”. It has mostly stayed resolutely silent in the wake of atrocities Hamas, PIJ and assorted civilian hangers-on committed in Israel on October 7.

As Louis-Klein writes, a real awakening is not simply about “trading one set of slogans for another.” It is the refusal to let pressures of political moments capture the moral imagination.

It’s about building “judgment rooted in knowledge, complexity, and historical understanding.”

About the writer:

Marika Sboros is a South African freelance investigative journalist with decades of experience writing fulltime for the country’s top media titles on a wide range of topics. She started her career as a hard-news reporter in the newsroom of the now defunct Rand Daily Mail, a campaigning anti-government newspaper during the worst excesses of the apartheid era. She commutes between South Africa and the UK.

While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).