AFTER US BOMBING, FINANCIAL TIMES & GUARDIAN PUSH ‘TAIL WAGGING THE DOG’ TROPE

Framing antisemitic tropes about Jewish or Israeli influence over US presidents has a long and toxic history.

By Adam Levick

On June 22, 2025, President Donald Trump ordered the US Air Force to drop multiple bunker-busting bombs on three nuclear facilities in Iran – the Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant, the Natanz Nuclear Facility, and the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center.

The US attack – almost certainly a one-off – occurred nine days into the war between Israel and the Islamic Republic which has seen Israel’s Air Force (IAF) achieve air supremacy, allowing the military to strike hundreds of military targets, including IRGC leaders, nuclear facilities and nuclear scientists throughout Iran – over 1,000 sorties in which the IAF lost not a single plane.

Power behind the Presidency! “Behind the US president, is Israel’s prime minister” is the maliciously contrived narrative of many respected international journalists fueling the antisemitic trope of Jewish global power and control.

However, that one American attack began to immediately be framed by some British media outlets as an example of the Israeli tail wagging the US dog, suggesting that the US president was coerced into making the decision by Israel’s prime minister.  This framing, evoking antisemitic tropes about alleged Jewish and/or Israeli power and undue influence over the United States, has a long and toxic history. In recent decades, it’s been associated with the progressive left, but has also been embraced by some within the MAGA right.

Enter Edward Luce, the Financial Times’s US Editor, and arguably the most openly anti-Israel contributor at the outlet. While not justifying the October 7 massacre, Luce suggested, in an opinion piece three days after worst antisemitic atrocity since the Holocaust, that the attacks in southern Israel were understandable. His foray into the Jewish power calumny began even before Trump made the decision.

On June 20, two days before the US strike, and amidst the debate about what Trump would do, Luce published a piece titled “MAGA’s battle with Israel for Trump’s mind”.  The headline ignored the debate within the administration between isolationists (also known as the “restrainers”) like Vice President JD Vance, and interventionists like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, instead casting Jerusalem as the lone party attempting to “control” Trump’s “mind”.

“The Great Dictator”. US national editor and columnist at the Financial Times, Edward Luce frequently suggests that it is the Israeli prime minister and “not Trump or his loyalists”who are “dictating the agenda.”

The text picks up on the headline’s theme:

Trump’s managerial style is usually to encourage squabbling between underlings. That enhances his role as the decider.  But it is Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, not Trump or his loyalists, who has been dictating the agenda….”

Luce’s use of the word “dictating”, referring to the act of imposing one’s will or authority on others, leaves little doubt that he’s imputing Israeli control over US decision making. He used  same word in a column he wrote after the US attack, (“Trump has opened a Pandora’s box”, June 22), which included the following:

Trump’s brief televised address following the strikes was meant to showcase his command of the situation. In reality, Netanyahu has been dictating events. But even he, cannot predict how Iran will respond.”

This pattern persisted in an opinion piece (“Trump’s step into the dark”) by the FT’s editorial board :

The Trump administration has allowed Netanyahu, who has long opposed diplomatic efforts with Tehran, to sideline diplomacy and drag Trump into a war he has wanted for a decade.”

It’s not just the Financial Times.

Andrew Roth, the Guardian’s global affairs correspondent based in Washington DC, wrote an analysis after the US strike also denying the US president agency, positing instead that Trump unwittingly fell into a “trap” set by Jerusalem (“What a difference a week makes: Trump falls into Netanyahu’s trap”, June 22).  In addition to the headline, Roth’s piece includes the following:

From early suggestions that the Trump administration would rein in Netanyahu’s military ambitions, it now appears that the Israeli PM has maneuvered the US into striking Iranian uranium enrichment sites directly after a series of military attacks that Washington was unable to deter the Israeli PM from.”

Further into the piece, Roth again picks up on the same theme of Israeli control over US presidents:

While Netanyahu had been able to maneuver previous administrations into supporting his military adventures in the region, some critics of Israel began to laud Trump for his ability to resist Netanyahu’s pull.”

The Israel-centric conspiratorial mindset of Roth can’t accept that the support of previous US presidents for Israeli wars with Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Hezbollah, was made of their own free will, based on what they felt was in the national interest.

Bombs Away. Suggesting unable to think what is in the best interests of the US and the world, Global Affairs Correspondent for the Guardian in Washington, DC, Andrew Roth, makes the case that Trump unwittingly fell into a “trap” set by Jerusalem.

The Guardian’s veteran columnist Simon Tisdall advanced a similar theme of an Israeli trap (“No matter what Trump says, the US has gone to war – and there will be profound and lasting consequences”, June 22). Tisdall wrote the following:

Trump, the isolationist president who vowed to avoid foreign wars, has walked slap bang into a trap prepared by Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu – a trap his smarter predecessors avoided.”

In addition to the antisemitic pedigree of such explanations for US decisions to use military force in the Middle East, the ‘Israel controls Washington’ charge is, and has always been, the go-to narrative for intellectually lazy commentators who don’t want to grapple with the complexities of the internal debates and foreign policy decision-making processes within the White House.

Of course, to gather accurate, fact-based assessments of the Trump administration’s decision to bomb Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan would require real journalism, a far more arduous task than deploying antisemitic dog-whistles about Israeli puppeteers controlling the president of the world’s greatest power.



About the writer:

Adam Levick immigrated to Israel from Philadelphia , USA in 2009, and has been co-editor of CAMERA UK since 2012. He previously worked as a researcher at NGO Monitor and, prior to that, at the Civil Rights Division of the Anti-Defamation League. He’s had op-eds published in numerous Jewish and non-Jewish publications, published longer papers at the Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs on “Antisemitism in Progressive Blogs” and “Antisemitic Cartoons in Progressive Blogs”, and was previously a member of the Online Antisemitism Working Group for the Global Forum to Combat Antisemitism. He frequently gives presentations about media bias and antisemitism, including one in 2022 at the inaugural conference of the London Centre for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism.





While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves.  LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).

ZAPIRO = ZERO

Ink dripping with blood, South African Jewish cartoonist endangers his people.

By Stephen Schulman

Like so many others, I am familiar with the work of the South African cartoonist Jonathan Shapiro better known as Zapiro. Shapiro, the source of many biting caricatures has been gifted with exceptional artistic talent but most sadly, very little else.

Shapiro positions himself as the great and fearless crusader wielding his mighty pen “fighting monsters” whilst carrying the banner of an unbiased moral authority that clearly differentiates wrong from right in exposing the injustices in our world. Unfortunately, his hatred of the State of Israel runs so deep that all of his cartoons of our country overflow with such venomous bilge that all pretence of his vaunted morality is jettisoned.

In Iran, a theocratic, despotic and repressive government boasts an atrocious human rights record of incarcerating, torturing, murdering and publicly executing its critics; in the first four months of 2025 alone, there have been at least 343 recorded exe­cu­tions. It has also long trumpeted its declared aim – with all means at its disposal – of obliterating the Jewish state. The IAEA has revealed that this regime while employing its well-honed strategy of prevarication, threats, obfuscation, subterfuge and outright lying has blatantly contravened all imposed limits and manufactured large amounts of highly enriched fissionable uranium suitable for the construction of an atomic bomb. How did our Shapiro react to this scenario of a Holocaust denying genocidal rogue state acquiring the means of mass destruction? His cartoon of the 12th June speaks for itself:

If you are looking for any condemnation or even hint of Iran’s actions, you will be sorely disappointed for once again Shapiro’s old flogging horse Netanyahu reappears, now depicted as a sinister war monger with a mushroom cloud spouting from his head. To our Jonathan it matters not one whit that Iran’s actions have been condemned by the European community and many Western countries. For, as usual, as portrayed in his regular vilifying and demonizing cartoons, Netanyahu i.e. Israel i.e. the Jews are the root of all conflicts and injustices in the Middle East.

Why his silence on Iran’s crimes and transgression? The answer lies with SA’s ruling African National Congress party’s accumulation of huge debts that were suddenly paid off by a mysterious but well known benefactor: Iran. Shapiro is not only a highly moral but also a most pragmatic individual and knows full well that any attempt to criticize his government’s close ally and party bankroller would have officialdom fall on him like a ton of bricks. How true for him is the old adage: “A dog barks for his masters.” After all, a man has to put food on the table for all those hungry mouths and nobody likes to be unceremoniously hoofed out of lucrative newspaper jobs and see his dedicated buying public boycotting his books. So accordingly, principles must be swept under the carpet and a politically correct silence must be maintained.

On the 13th June, only one day after the publication of this scurrilous cartoon, Israel launched a pre-emptive strike on Iran’s military-nuclear complex – a war for its survival that has been condoned by the enlightened international community. While Israel has confined its targets to Iran’s military and nuclear installations, Iran, unsurprisingly, has had no compunction about sending its UAV’s and missiles into a hospital and heavily concentrated urban areas.

The war is still ongoing and Shapiro’s pen will be busy drawing for his select audience. If anyone wonders about the content of his forthcoming cartoons, a glance at a few of his notorious past endeavors should leave no doubt. The cartoon of the 8th October 2024 is so disgusting in its distortion of truth and warped narrative that it is simply beneath contempt. Other repulsive cartoons portray Israel’s P.M sitting in a bath of Arab blood and as the charioteer behind the four horsemen of the apocalypse.

But what about Shapiro’s pursuing of some genuine “monsters” in this world such as the repressive North Korean regime and China’s persecution of the Falun Gong sect and the cultural genocide of the Tibetans and the Uyghur? Neither a squeak nor a plaintive bleat emanates from our crusading knight, for after all, China is a valued trading partner and investor in SA’s crumbling economy and it wouldn’t do to ruffle their feathers.

On October 7th 2023, a Hamas terrorist army invaded Israel in an orgy of rape, sodomy, plundering and destruction, sadistically murdering twelve hundred people – the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Two hundred and fifty innocent people – from little children to infirm octogenarians were forcibly abducted into Gaza and held in unspeakable conditions, suffering sexual abuse, torturing and beatings while being systematically starved and dehydrated. Many of them were murdered in captivity including a young mother together with her toddler and his small brother. Fifty hostages still remain and of those twenty are reputed to be still alive. Would this not arouse outrage in the heart of any decent, thinking person? Jonathan Shapiro, true to form in his callousness and selective morality, turns a blind eye to the suffering of his fellow Jews in Israel and never a hint of the tragedy or condemnation of its perpetrators has ever appeared in his work.

Revolting Reality. More revolting than Zapiro’s false caricatures is the true picture of Iran such as seeing a 75% increase in executions during first four months of 2025 over 2024 with at least 343 according to Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO).

Nevertheless, to Shapiro living in Cape Town, Jewish lives do matter. They do indeed matter very much to him when they are in close proximity and when they can serve him or be exploited for his personal needs. He besmirches Israel at every opportunity, yet had no problem in sending his children for a good education to Herzlia, the Jewish day school. He also sent them to a Zionist Jewish youth movement’s summer camps knowing that they would be well looked after and he would have peace of mind. He also had no qualms about applying for a place for his aged mother in the Jewish home for the aged in Cape Town.

Jonathan Shapiro is nothing more than a self serving hypocrite, a pitiable individual hiding behind the façade of a crusader with a high moral stance but who applies his principles only when they serve his needs. The stench of a putrid morality has long clung to this despicable personage.



About the writer:

Stephen Schulman is a graduate of the South African Jewish socialist youth movement Habonim, who immigrated to Israel in 1969 and retired in 2012 after over 40 years of English teaching. He was for many years a senior examiner for the English matriculation and co-authored two English textbooks for the upper grades in high school. Now happily retired, he spends his time between his family, his hobbies and reading to try to catch up on his ignorance.